-
What is the $250 million deal between California and Google?
California lawmakers have negotiated a $250 million deal with Google to provide financial support for local journalism. This agreement is intended to stabilize struggling newsrooms across the state, as many local outlets face severe financial challenges. Governor Gavin Newsom has described the deal as a 'major breakthrough' for the industry.
-
Why are journalists upset about this agreement?
Journalists and unions have expressed strong opposition to the deal, labeling it a 'shakedown.' Critics argue that it allows Google to evade accountability for its role in the decline of local journalism. They believe that the agreement fails to address the deeper issues facing the industry and undermines potential legislation that could require tech companies to compensate news outlets more fairly.
-
How does this deal affect local journalism?
The deal is designed to provide immediate financial relief to local newsrooms, which have been struggling due to declining revenues. However, critics warn that it may not offer a sustainable solution. By accepting this funding, local news organizations might miss out on more comprehensive legislative efforts that could secure ongoing support and accountability from tech companies.
-
What are the potential long-term effects on tech and news relationships?
The long-term effects of this deal could reshape the relationship between tech companies and news organizations. While it may provide short-term relief, it could also set a precedent that allows tech giants like Google to avoid more substantial accountability measures. Experts argue that without stronger legislation, the deal may hinder efforts to create a fairer compensation model for news outlets.
-
What do experts say about the deal?
Experts have voiced concerns about the deal's effectiveness. Victor Pickard from the University of Pennsylvania criticized it for not securing more substantial funding and for sidelining critical legislative efforts. Assemblymember Buffy Wicks defended the agreement as the 'art of the possible,' emphasizing the urgent need for immediate support for struggling newsrooms.