In late 2025, the US under President Trump declared Europe an adversary, marking a significant shift in international relations. This change raises many questions about the future of transatlantic ties, European security, and global stability. Why has the US taken this stance, and what does it mean for Europe and the wider world? Below, we explore the key issues and answer common questions about this evolving geopolitical landscape.
-
Why did the US start seeing Europe as an adversary?
The US, under President Trump, shifted its foreign policy focus, citing concerns over immigration, demographic changes, and the influence of nationalist parties in Europe. The 2025 National Security Strategy describes Europe as 'weak' and 'decaying,' supporting far-right parties that challenge traditional alliances. This marks a move away from previous cooperation towards a more transactional, militarized approach.
-
How are US policies affecting European countries?
US policies now emphasize self-reliance for European nations, urging them to defend their interests independently. Countries like Germany are increasing defense spending and reducing economic dependence on China amid global trade tensions. The US's stance has also emboldened nationalist and patriotic parties across Europe, impacting regional politics and alliances.
-
What does this mean for NATO and transatlantic alliances?
The US's new approach signals a potential weakening of traditional NATO ties, with the US less willing to lead or support collective defense efforts. European countries are being urged to bolster their own military capabilities, which could lead to a more fragmented alliance structure and a shift towards regional security arrangements.
-
Could Europe respond to US hostility?
Yes, European nations could respond by increasing their military independence, strengthening regional alliances, or pursuing diplomatic strategies to counterbalance US influence. Some countries are already taking steps to reduce reliance on US support and assert their own strategic interests in global affairs.
-
What are the broader implications of this shift for global stability?
This shift could lead to a more fragmented international order, with competing spheres of influence and increased geopolitical tensions. The US's move away from traditional alliances might embolden authoritarian regimes worldwide and accelerate the decline of liberal internationalism, impacting global peace and security.