The recent declaration of Kashmir's Jamia Siraj-ul-Uloom as an unlawful institution has sparked widespread concern and debate. The government cites security and legal reasons, but critics argue it’s part of a broader crackdown on religious and civic institutions in Kashmir. Many are asking what led to this decision, what the allegations are, and how it impacts the local community. Below, we explore the key questions surrounding this controversial move.
The Indian authorities have accused Jamia Siraj-ul-Uloom of having links to Jamaat-e-Islami, a banned political organization. They cite issues related to land use and financial transparency as reasons for declaring the seminary unlawful under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). The seminary denies these allegations, claiming they are politically motivated and aimed at suppressing religious education in Kashmir.
The government alleges that the seminary has covert links to Jamaat-e-Islami, which is banned in India. They also point to concerns over land use and financial activities that allegedly violate regulations. However, the seminary and its supporters deny any such connections, asserting that the institution is focused on religious and educational pursuits without any political affiliations.
Since revoking Article 370 in 2019, India has increased its control over Kashmir, targeting religious and social institutions it views as threats. Declaring the seminary unlawful is seen by many as part of this pattern of tightening restrictions, aiming to curb dissent and influence local civic life. Critics argue that these actions undermine Kashmiri autonomy and suppress religious freedoms.
The closure of Jamia Siraj-ul-Uloom affects over 800 students who rely on the seminary for religious and educational instruction. It also impacts the local community, which views the institution as a vital part of their cultural and religious identity. Critics warn that such moves could lead to increased unrest and further alienation of Kashmir’s residents from the central government.
Yes, the seminary and its supporters have criticized the government’s move, calling it unjust and politically motivated. They are likely to pursue legal avenues to challenge the declaration, arguing that it violates religious freedoms and due process. The outcome of such challenges could influence future government actions against similar institutions.
Kashmiri leaders like Mehbooba Mufti and Aga Syed Ruhullah Mehdi have condemned the move, calling it unjust and harmful to the region’s social fabric. International observers and human rights groups have expressed concern over the increasing restrictions on religious and civic institutions in Kashmir, viewing it as part of a broader pattern of repression.
Pahalgam, with steep ravines, grassy hillsides and pine forests, is a base for Hindu pilgrimages that business operators hope will revive visitors.