The recent US-brokered peace agreement between Armenia and Azerbaijan marks a significant shift in the geopolitics of the South Caucasus. This deal, which includes a 99-year US lease of a strategic corridor through Armenia, aims to boost regional trade and stability. But what are the broader implications for neighboring countries like Iran, Russia, and Turkey? Below, we explore the key questions surrounding this historic agreement and its potential impact on regional peace and power dynamics.
-
How will the US lease of the corridor affect Iran, Russia, and Turkey?
The US lease of the corridor, known as TRIPP, is seen as a strategic move that could shift regional influence. Iran opposes the deal, viewing it as a threat to its regional role and security, with Iranian officials warning it could lead to 'geopolitical suffocation.' Russia's response is cautious, as it seeks to maintain influence in the region, while Turkey supports the deal, viewing it as an opportunity to strengthen regional ties and counterbalance Iran and Russia.
-
Could this new corridor change trade routes in the Caucasus?
Yes, the corridor has the potential to significantly alter trade routes by providing a direct link between Azerbaijan and its Nakhchivan exclave, bypassing Iran. This could facilitate faster, more secure trade flows between the South Caucasus and the wider region, boosting economic opportunities for Azerbaijan and Armenia while challenging existing transit routes controlled by Iran and Russia.
-
What are the risks of regional opposition to the deal?
Opposition from Iran is the most prominent, with Tehran warning that the corridor could lead to increased regional tensions and threaten its influence. There is also concern about possible unrest or opposition within Armenia and Azerbaijan, especially if the deal is perceived as favoring one side or if implementation faces delays. Such opposition could destabilize the fragile peace and lead to renewed conflict.
-
How might this deal impact the long-term peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan?
While the deal aims to end decades of conflict, its success depends on implementation and mutual trust. The recognition of borders and the US development rights to the corridor are positive steps, but unresolved issues like Armenia’s constitutional changes and reciprocal access remain. If managed well, the deal could pave the way for lasting peace, but ongoing tensions and regional rivalries pose risks.
-
What role does Turkey play in this new regional dynamic?
Turkey supports the peace deal and sees it as an opportunity to strengthen regional cooperation and counterbalance Iran and Russia. Ankara’s backing could help facilitate the deal’s implementation, but it also adds another layer of complexity, as Turkey’s regional ambitions and support for Azerbaijan may influence how the peace process unfolds.