What's happened
A French court sentenced 10 individuals for online harassment targeting Brigitte Macron, falsely claiming she was born a man and linking her age gap with her husband to pedophilia. Sentences ranged from awareness training to suspended prison terms, following a two-day trial in October. Macron's family testified about harassment's impact.
What's behind the headline?
The court's rulings underscore the severity of online harassment and misinformation campaigns targeting public figures. The sentences, including suspended jail terms and awareness training, reflect France's attempt to balance accountability with education. The case reveals how conspiracy theories—such as the false claim that Brigitte Macron was born Jean-Michel Trogneux—can have tangible legal consequences. It also exposes the influence of social media personalities, like Amandine Roy and Zoé Sagan, in spreading harmful rumors. Macron's decision to pursue legal action signals a broader effort to combat digital abuse, but the case also raises questions about free speech and satire. The international dimension, with the Macrons filing a US defamation suit against Candace Owens, illustrates the transnational nature of misinformation. Moving forward, this case may set a precedent for addressing online hate speech and conspiracy theories in France and beyond, emphasizing the need for stricter regulation and digital literacy.
What the papers say
The articles from NY Post, The Times of Israel, France 24, The Independent, and the New York Times collectively highlight the legal consequences faced by the defendants and the broader context of misinformation campaigns against Brigitte Macron. While all sources agree on the court's rulings and the nature of the comments, some emphasize the impact on Macron's family and the societal implications of online harassment. The NY Post and France 24 focus on the legal sentences and the defendants' intentions, with France 24 noting the role of conspiracy theories and the defendants' claims of humor or satire. The Independent and the New York Times provide detailed background on the conspiracy theories and the international legal actions, such as the US defamation suit. The Times emphasizes the societal risks of misinformation, while the Independent highlights the personal toll on Macron's family. Overall, the coverage underscores the seriousness of online hate speech and the legal measures being taken, with some sources pointing to the broader challenge of regulating digital spaces.
How we got here
The case stems from years of conspiracy theories alleging Brigitte Macron's gender and linking her to false claims about her past. The harassment intensified online, prompting Macron to pursue legal action to set an example. The defendants posted malicious comments, some viewed tens of thousands of times, which the court deemed 'particularly degrading, insulting, and malicious.' The case highlights ongoing issues with misinformation and conspiracy theories targeting public figures in France.
Go deeper
Common question
-
What Was the Outcome of the Macron Harassment Case?
In 2026, a high-profile online harassment case against individuals targeting Brigitte Macron made headlines worldwide. The case highlights ongoing issues with online misinformation, hate speech, and legal responses to digital abuse. Curious about what happened, how the courts responded, and what this means for online harassment laws today? Below, we explore the key questions surrounding this landmark case and its implications.
-
How Do High-Profile Legal Cases Impact Public Trust and Online Safety?
Recent legal actions against online harassment and misinformation, like the case involving Brigitte Macron, highlight the growing importance of accountability in digital spaces. Such cases raise questions about how legal measures influence public trust, online safety, and future legislation. Below, we explore key questions about the societal impact of these high-profile legal cases and what they mean for the future of online discourse.
More on these topics
-
Brigitte Marie-Claude Macron (French: [bʁiʒit maʁi klod makʁɔ̃]; née Trogneux [tʁɔɲø], previously Auzière [ozjɛːʁ]; born 13 April 1953) is a French former teacher. She is the wife of Emmanuel Macron, who has served as President of France an
-
Emmanuel Jean-Michel Frédéric Macron is a French politician who has been President of France and ex officio Co-Prince of Andorra since 14 May 2017.
-
Candace Amber Owens Farmer is an American conservative author, commentator, and political activist. Initially critical of President Donald Trump and the Republican Party, Owens has become known for her increasingly pro-Trump activism as a black woman, in