What's happened
New York City Mayor Mamdani has revoked several executive orders from his predecessor, including those supporting Israel and adopting the IHRA definition of antisemitism. The move reverses policies that restricted boycotts and aimed to combat antisemitism, sparking criticism from Israel and local officials. The changes reflect a shift in the city's stance on Israel and antisemitism policies as of January 2026.
What's behind the headline?
The reversal of these policies signals a significant shift in New York City's approach to Israel and antisemitism. Mamdani's actions challenge the widely accepted IHRA definition, which many Jewish organizations endorse for its clarity in identifying antisemitism. Critics argue that this move could embolden anti-Israel sentiments and undermine efforts to combat antisemitism, while supporters claim it restores free speech and avoids conflating criticism of Israel with hate. This policy change may influence other jurisdictions considering similar reversals, potentially weakening international standards against antisemitism. The timing suggests a response to the recent escalation in Middle East tensions, positioning Mamdani as a leader willing to challenge established norms in favor of a more open debate on Israel and antisemitism policies.
What the papers say
The New Arab reports that Mamdani emphasized governing expansively and not abandoning principles, while also clarifying his stance on antisemitism and government power. NY Post highlights the criticism from Israel's foreign ministry, condemning the revocation of the IHRA definition and the lifting of restrictions on boycotting Israel, calling it 'antisemitic gasoline.' Politico notes that the revocation of policies supportive of Israel, including the IHRA definition, marks a departure from Adams-era measures aimed at preventing economic sanctions and protecting Jewish sites. The contrasting opinions reflect a broader debate over free speech, anti-discrimination measures, and the political implications of these reversals.
How we got here
The previous administration under Mayor Eric Adams implemented policies to support Israel, including banning city officials from boycotting or divesting from Israel and adopting the IHRA definition of antisemitism, which many see as a standard in combating antisemitism. Mamdani's administration has now revoked these measures, citing a desire for a fresh start and policy re-evaluation amid ongoing tensions related to the Israel-Palestine conflict.
Go deeper
Common question
-
What does reversing the Israel-Hamas conflict definition mean for politics?
Recent changes in New York City’s policies on Israel and antisemitism have sparked widespread debate. Mayor Mamdani’s decision to revoke the previous administration’s support for Israel, including the adoption of the IHRA definition of antisemitism, raises important questions about free speech, anti-discrimination efforts, and political direction. What are the implications of these reversals, and how might they influence politics locally and globally? Below, we explore the key questions surrounding this significant policy shift.
-
How are major cities reacting to recent political shifts like NYC's reversal on Israel policies?
Recent political changes in major cities such as New York have sparked widespread reactions. From policy reversals to protests, people are asking how these shifts impact local and international relations. Below, we explore the key questions about these developments and what they mean for the future of city politics and global diplomacy.
More on these topics