What's happened
Ghana's IMF review confirms satisfactory progress, unlocking $385 million, with reforms boosting growth and stability. Jordan receives disbursements totaling $240 million, maintaining resilience amid regional challenges. Both countries advance structural reforms and debt restructuring, supporting economic stability.
What's behind the headline?
Ghana's IMF Review
The successful fifth review under Ghana's ECF program signifies a pivotal step in its economic recovery. The IMF highlights tangible results from reforms, including improved fiscal discipline, debt restructuring, and a strengthening external sector driven by gold and cocoa exports. However, vulnerabilities remain, especially within state-owned banks, requiring ongoing governance and recapitalization efforts.
Jordan's Disbursement and Stability
Jordan's economy remains resilient, supported by sound macroeconomic policies and international backing. The IMF notes growth acceleration, stable inflation, and strong reserves, with reforms targeting water, electricity, and health sectors. Continued focus on structural reforms and external vulnerability management will be crucial for sustained stability.
Broader Implications
Both countries demonstrate the importance of IMF programs in stabilizing economies facing regional and global headwinds. Ghana's progress signals a potential model for resource-driven recovery, while Jordan's resilience underscores the value of structural reforms and external support. Their experiences highlight the ongoing need for fiscal discipline, governance, and external cooperation to ensure long-term stability.
What the papers say
All Africa reports that Ghana's IMF review confirms satisfactory progress, with disbursements of about $385 million, emphasizing reforms in financial stability, debt restructuring, and macroeconomic indicators. The IMF praises Ghana's performance but warns of persistent vulnerabilities in state-owned banks.
Meanwhile, Arab News details Jordan's receipt of approximately $240 million from the IMF, citing resilience supported by macroeconomic policies and reforms in water, electricity, and health sectors. The IMF underscores the importance of structural reforms and external support to manage regional tensions and external shocks.
Contrasting these reports, All Africa emphasizes Ghana's debt restructuring achievements and external sector improvements, while Arab News focuses on Jordan's macroeconomic stability and ongoing reforms. Both articles highlight the significance of IMF programs in fostering economic resilience but differ in their focus—Ghana on fiscal and financial reforms, Jordan on external stability and sectoral reforms.
How we got here
Both Ghana and Jordan have been implementing IMF-supported reform programs to stabilize their economies. Ghana's reforms focus on financial sector stability, debt restructuring, and fiscal discipline, while Jordan emphasizes macroeconomic resilience, structural reforms, and managing external pressures. These efforts are part of broader strategies to foster growth and stability amid regional and global uncertainties.
Go deeper
Common question
-
What Recent Reforms Did Ghana and Jordan Undertake to Get IMF Support?
Ghana and Jordan have recently made significant reforms to secure support from the International Monetary Fund (IMF). These reforms aim to stabilize their economies, boost growth, and manage regional challenges. Curious about what exactly they did and how it impacts their future? Below, we explore the key reforms, the benefits of new funding, regional challenges, and what this means for everyday citizens.
More on these topics
-
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) is an international financial institution and a specialized agency of the United Nations, headquartered in Washington, D.C. It consists of 191 member countries, and its stated mission is "working to foster global...
-
Ghana, officially the Republic of Ghana, is a country along the Gulf of Guinea and the Atlantic Ocean, in the subregion of West Africa.