What's happened
As the 2024 election approaches, tariffs on China remain a contentious issue. Sullivan supports maintaining tariffs, while Trump proposes higher tariffs. Harris's stance is less clear, reflecting a divide in the Democratic Party over trade policy. Economic implications of tariffs are debated among experts.
Why it matters
What the papers say
According to Axios, Vice President Kamala Harris's potential presidency raises questions about her trade policies, with Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen emphasizing the benefits of free trade. Yellen argues that high tariffs could harm American families and businesses, stating, "Sweeping, untargeted tariffs would raise prices for American families and make our businesses less competitive." In contrast, Sullivan supports the Biden administration's tariff strategy, claiming it is essential for addressing China's economic practices. The South China Morning Post highlights the applause from the business community for Trump's tariff proposals, despite concerns from economists about their long-term economic impact. Critics argue that tariffs may not effectively raise worker incomes while simultaneously benefiting businesses, as they can compress national income and lead to economic pain for both groups.
How we got here
The Biden administration has retained tariffs initially imposed by Trump, aiming to address economic competition with China. As the election nears, candidates are articulating their trade policies, influencing voter sentiment and economic expectations.
More on these topics
-
Donald John Trump is an American politician, media personality, and businessman who served as the 45th president of the United States from 2017 to 2021.
-
China, officially the People's Republic of China, is a country in East Asia. It is the world's most populous country, with a population of around 1.4 billion in 2019.
-
Kamala Devi Harris is an American attorney and politician who has served as the junior United States Senator from California since 2017.