What's happened
In early October 2025, Russian drones and fighter jets repeatedly violated NATO airspace over Poland, Estonia, Romania, and Denmark. NATO responded by launching operation Eastern Sentry, deploying additional air defense assets, and holding Article 4 consultations. Poland demands lethal force against intrusions, while Western Europe hesitates, highlighting divisions in political will amid Russia's calibrated provocations.
What's behind the headline?
NATO's Dilemma: Balancing Deterrence and Escalation
NATO faces a complex challenge in responding to Russia's calibrated airspace violations. Russia's strategy is not outright war but psychological and political warfare aimed at exploiting Western hesitancy and undermining alliance cohesion. The repeated incursions, including drone swarms and fighter jets entering NATO airspace, serve as probes testing the alliance's thresholds.
Divergent Responses Within NATO
Poland and the Baltic states advocate for a robust, lethal response to any airspace violations, emphasizing sovereignty and deterrence. Conversely, Western European nations, including Germany, urge caution to avoid escalation, reflecting uneven political will despite increased defense spending.
The Cost and Efficacy of Current Defenses
NATO's existing air defense systems are optimized for high-value threats like missiles and fighter jets, not low-cost, mass-produced drones. Using expensive missiles to shoot down cheap drones is financially unsustainable. NATO's development of cost-effective interceptor drones aims to address this imbalance, but deployment speed and scale remain critical challenges.
Strategic Implications
Russia's incremental aggression aims to erode NATO's Article 5 mutual defense guarantee by sowing doubt and division. The alliance's credibility hinges on decisive, proportionate responses that reinforce red lines without triggering broader conflict. Failure to act decisively risks emboldening Russia and weakening transatlantic solidarity.
Forecast
NATO will likely continue to bolster air defenses and political consultations, but internal divisions may persist. The alliance must accelerate deployment of cost-efficient counter-drone technologies and clarify rules of engagement to deter further incursions effectively. The psychological dimension of this conflict will intensify, making political cohesion the alliance's most vital asset.
What the papers say
The South China Morning Post highlights the pattern of Russian provocations as "calibrated tests of will," noting that despite increased defense spending, "political will is uneven" across Europe. Business Insider UK reports on NATO's efforts to develop cost-effective interceptor drones, quoting Adm. Pierre Vandier on the need for "mass versus mass" solutions to counter Russia's industrial-scale drone production. The Independent presents the sharp contrast in responses within NATO, with Poland's Foreign Minister Radek Sikorski warning Russia bluntly that intruders will be shot down, while NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte emphasizes measured threat assessments. The Guardian provides historical context, comparing current airspace violations to Cold War incidents, suggesting that shooting down intruders can reinforce red lines without escalating conflict. The NY Post frames Russia's incursions as part of a broader psychological war aimed at weakening NATO's political cohesion, warning that "every airspace breach met not with deep strikes... delivers exactly what Moscow wants." Politico advocates for a more assertive European response, including extending air defenses over Ukraine and striking Russian logistical nodes, arguing "Europe is at war with Russia, whether it likes it or not." These perspectives collectively illustrate the tension between deterrence, cost, political will, and the evolving nature of hybrid warfare confronting NATO.
How we got here
Since 2022, Russia has incrementally tested NATO's resolve through airspace violations and drone incursions, echoing past aggressions in Georgia and Crimea. NATO's collective defense mechanisms, including Article 4 consultations, have been activated as member states grapple with balancing deterrence and escalation risks amid increasing Russian provocations.
Go deeper
- How is NATO developing new technologies to counter drone threats?
- What are the political divisions within NATO regarding responses to Russia?
- Could shooting down Russian aircraft escalate the conflict?
Common question
-
What Is NATO Doing About Russian Drone Threats in 2025?
Recent Russian drone and aircraft violations over NATO member states like Poland, Romania, and Estonia have raised serious concerns about airspace security. NATO is actively responding to these provocations by enhancing its defenses, developing new technology, and increasing military presence on its eastern flank. But what specific measures are being taken, and what does this mean for European security? Below, we explore the key questions about NATO's response to Russian drone threats and the broader implications for regional stability.
-
What Are the Main Global Security Threats in 2025?
As the world faces new and evolving security challenges in 2025, understanding the key threats is crucial. From rising tensions in Eastern Europe to terrorism concerns in Europe, recent incidents highlight the shifting landscape of global security. Here, we explore the main threats today and what they mean for the future.
-
What Are the Latest Defense Technologies Being Developed in 2025?
As global tensions rise, countries are investing heavily in new defense technologies to stay ahead. From advanced interceptor drones to enhanced military capabilities, the landscape of warfare is rapidly evolving. Curious about what innovations are shaping the future of defense? Below, we explore the key developments and their implications for global security.
-
Why Are NATO and Russia Tensing Up Over Airspace Incursions?
Recent reports reveal increased Russian drone and jet violations over NATO countries like Poland, Estonia, Romania, and Denmark. This escalation raises questions about NATO's response, the risk of wider conflict, and why some European nations are hesitant to escalate further. Here, we explore the key issues behind these tensions and what they mean for regional security.
More on these topics
-
Poland, officially the Republic of Poland, is a country located in Central Europe. It is divided into 16 administrative subdivisions, covering an area of 312,696 square kilometres, and has a largely temperate seasonal climate.
-
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization, also called the North Atlantic Alliance, is an intergovernmental military alliance between 30 North American and European countries.
-
Russia, or the Russian Federation, is a transcontinental country located in Eastern Europe and Northern Asia. Covering an area of 17,125,200 square kilometres, it is the largest country in the world by area, spanning more than one-eighth of the Earth's in
-
Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin is a Russian politician and former intelligence officer who has served as President of Russia since 2012, previously holding the position from 1999 until 2008.
-
Ukraine is a country in Eastern Europe. It is the second-largest European country after Russia, which borders it to the east and northeast.
-
Donald John Trump is an American politician, media personality, and businessman who served as the 45th president of the United States from 2017 to 2021.