What's happened
On December 31, 2025, President Trump announced the removal of National Guard troops from Chicago, Los Angeles, and Portland following multiple legal setbacks. Despite claiming crime reductions due to the deployments, courts blocked or limited troop presence, notably the Supreme Court halting Chicago deployments. Trump warned troops could return if crime rises.
What's behind the headline?
Legal and Political Clash
President Trump's deployment of National Guard troops to Democrat-led cities was a politically charged move aimed at showcasing a tough-on-crime stance ahead of the 2026 midterms. However, the deployments faced significant legal hurdles, with courts emphasizing the constitutional limits on federal military involvement in local law enforcement without proper legal justification.
Limited Impact and Symbolism
Despite Trump's claims that the Guard presence reduced crime, in cities like Chicago and Portland, troops were largely sidelined by legal injunctions and never patrolled streets. This suggests the deployments were more symbolic political gestures than effective crime-fighting measures.
Federal vs. State Authority
The controversy highlights the tension between federal authority and state control over the National Guard. Governors and local officials, particularly Democrats, resisted what they saw as federal overreach, successfully using the courts to assert their jurisdiction.
Future Implications
Trump's warning to redeploy troops "in a much different and stronger form" if crime rises signals potential future confrontations over federal intervention in local policing. This could escalate political polarization and legal battles, especially as the 2026 midterms approach.
Impact on Public Perception
For residents in affected cities, the legal battles and troop withdrawals may reinforce skepticism about militarized responses to crime. The focus may shift toward community-based policing and violence intervention programs, which some local leaders credit for crime reductions.
Summary
The National Guard deployments under Trump have underscored the limits of federal power in domestic law enforcement and the politicization of crime policy. The legal setbacks mark a significant check on executive authority, while the ongoing presence in cities like New Orleans and Washington, D.C., remains a point of contention.
What the papers say
The New York Times details how the Supreme Court's ruling last week blocked troop deployments in Chicago, with Mayor Brandon Johnson calling the efforts "unnecessary and unconstitutional," highlighting local collaboration in crime reduction. The Independent reports that despite local officials noting crime declines, Trump credited the National Guard presence for reductions in New Orleans, where troops remain deployed at the governor's request. Al Jazeera emphasizes the legal context, noting that the Guard's role was limited to support functions due to the absence of an Insurrection Act invocation, and that courts have repeatedly blocked or limited deployments. France 24 and AP News provide insight into the legal setbacks in California, Oregon, and Illinois, with California Attorney General Rob Bonta calling the troop removals a "major litigation victory" and criticizing the politicization of the Guard. Trump’s own statements on Truth Social, quoted by the NY Post and SBS, frame the withdrawals as temporary and blame Democratic officials for opposing the deployments despite claimed crime improvements. These sources collectively illustrate the political and legal tug-of-war over the Guard's role in urban crime control during Trump's second term.
How we got here
Trump deployed National Guard troops to several Democrat-led US cities in 2025 to combat crime and illegal immigration. These deployments faced legal challenges, with courts limiting or blocking troop presence, including a Supreme Court ruling against Chicago deployments. The National Guard's role in law enforcement remains legally restricted without invoking the Insurrection Act.
Go deeper
- Why did courts block National Guard deployments in some cities?
- How have local officials responded to the troop withdrawals?
- What are the implications for federal and state authority over the National Guard?
Common question
-
Why did Trump withdraw National Guard troops from US cities?
President Trump recently announced the withdrawal of National Guard troops from cities like Chicago, Los Angeles, and Portland. This move has sparked questions about the legal challenges, the impact on local security, and what might happen next. Many are wondering why the troops were pulled back, whether they might return, and how this affects ongoing efforts to combat crime and immigration issues. Below, we explore the key reasons behind this decision and what it means for the cities involved.
-
Why did Trump withdraw National Guard troops from major US cities?
In late 2025, President Trump announced the withdrawal of National Guard troops from cities like Chicago, Los Angeles, and Portland. This move followed legal challenges and court rulings that limited or blocked the deployment of troops. Many wonder why the troops were pulled and what impact this has on crime and law enforcement. Below, we explore the reasons behind the withdrawals, the legal issues involved, and what might happen next.
-
How Are Recent Legal Setbacks Affecting US Law Enforcement Policies?
Recent legal challenges have significantly impacted how US law enforcement agencies operate, especially in major cities. Courts have limited or halted deployments of National Guard troops, raising questions about the future of crime control strategies. In this page, we explore the legal issues behind these setbacks, how officials are responding, and what might happen next as law enforcement adapts to these new legal realities.
More on these topics
-
Donald John Trump is an American politician, media personality, and businessman who served as the 45th president of the United States from 2017 to 2021.
-
Chicago, officially the City of Chicago, is the most populous city in the U.S. state of Illinois, and the third-most-populous city in the United States.
-
Test cricket is the form of the sport of cricket with the longest match duration, and is considered the game's highest standard.
-
National guard is the name used by a wide variety of current and historical uniformed organizations in different countries. The original National Guard was formed during the French Revolution around a cadre of defectors from the French Guards.
National...
-
Gavin Christopher Newsom is an American politician and businessman who is the 40th governor of California, serving since January 2019.
-
The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the federal judiciary of the United States of America. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all federal and state court cases that involve a point of federal law, and original jurisdict
-
Portland most commonly refers to:
Portland, Oregon, the most populous city in the U.S. state of Oregon
Portland, Maine, the most populous city in the U.S. state of Maine
Isle of Portland, a tied island in the English Channel
Portland may also refer to...
-
California is a state in the Pacific Region of the United States. With 39.5 million residents across a total area of about 163,696 square miles, California is the most populous U.S. state and the third-largest by area, and is also the world's thirty-fourt
-
Portland ( PORT-lənd) is the most populous city in the U.S. state of Oregon. Located in the Pacific Northwest at the confluence of the Willamette and Columbia rivers, it is the 28th-most populous city in the United States, sixth-most populous on the West