What's happened
The US skipped its UN human rights review for the second time, citing bias and political reasons. Critics warn this weakens global human rights efforts and signals a retreat from international cooperation. The move follows Trump's withdrawal from UN bodies, raising concerns about US leadership on human rights.
What's behind the headline?
The US's decision to boycott its UN human rights review reflects a broader retreat from multilateral engagement under the current administration. Critics argue that this move undermines the universality of human rights and diminishes US influence in shaping international standards. The boycott signals a prioritization of national sovereignty over global cooperation, potentially emboldening other countries to follow suit. This stance risks weakening the legitimacy of the UN's human rights mechanisms and could lead to increased impunity for rights violations within the US and abroad. The timing, amid rising domestic rights concerns, suggests a strategic move to avoid international scrutiny, but it ultimately damages the US's reputation as a human rights leader. Moving forward, this could hinder efforts to address global rights issues and diminish US credibility in diplomatic negotiations.
What the papers say
The Independent highlights the diplomatic fallout from the US absence, emphasizing the regret expressed by UN council members and the call for the US to re-engage. The AP News underscores the criticism from civil rights groups like the ACLU, warning that the boycott sets a dangerous precedent. The Times of Israel provides context on the rarity of such a boycott, noting that only Israel has previously skipped its review, and discusses the broader implications of the US's withdrawal from UN processes. All sources agree that the US's absence weakens international human rights efforts and signals a retreat from global leadership, with critics warning of long-term consequences for US credibility and the effectiveness of UN mechanisms.
How we got here
The UN's Universal Periodic Review (UPR) assesses member states' human rights records every four to five years. The US previously participated but decided to boycott this year's review, citing perceived bias against Israel and disagreements over reform. The Trump administration's withdrawal from UN bodies in February 2025 further influenced this decision, reversing previous engagement during Trump's first term. The US's absence marks only the second time a country has boycotted the process since 2008, raising concerns about its commitment to global human rights norms.
Go deeper
Common question
-
Why Did the US Skip Its UN Human Rights Review?
The US recently chose to boycott its UN human rights review, raising questions about its motives and the broader implications for global human rights efforts. Many wonder why the US decided to skip this important process and what it means for its leadership on human rights issues worldwide. Below, we explore the reasons behind this move, its potential impact, and what it signals about the US's role in international cooperation.
More on these topics
-
The United States of America, commonly known as the United States or America, is a country mostly located in central North America, between Canada and Mexico.
-
The American Civil Liberties Union is a nonprofit organization founded in 1920 "to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to every person in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States".