What's happened
The High Court of Australia ruled that the government can seize a Russian lease near Parliament for security reasons, but must pay compensation. The case followed legislation passed in 2023 to revoke the lease, citing national security concerns. Russia challenged the move, leading to a court decision today.
What's behind the headline?
What the papers say
The Moscow Times reports that the High Court upheld the law but ordered compensation, highlighting the legal affirmation of Australia's security measures. Reuters emphasizes the court's unanimous decision and the legal basis for seizing the land, noting the importance of compensation. Al Jazeera provides context on the 2023 legislation and Russia's reaction, describing the move as 'Russophobic hysteria' and detailing the legal arguments about constitutionality. The Independent and AP News both focus on the court's ruling that the government acted lawfully but must pay Russia, with the latter noting the legal costs and the broader diplomatic strain. SBS offers a detailed timeline of events, including the initial lease, the security concerns, and the legal proceedings, framing the story within the context of ongoing Australia-Russia tensions.
How we got here
In 2008, Australia granted Russia a 99-year lease for land near Parliament House to build an embassy. In 2023, Australian authorities passed laws to cancel the lease, citing security risks, after intelligence warned of potential threats. Russia challenged the law, claiming it was unconstitutional and lacked evidence of a threat. The High Court's decision affirms the government's authority to revoke the lease but mandates compensation to Russia, which paid about $2 million for the land. The legal battle reflects ongoing tensions between Australia and Russia, especially after Russia's invasion of Ukraine and the downing of MH17.
Go deeper
Common question
-
Why Did Australia Order Russia to Pay Compensation Over the Lease Dispute?
The recent legal battle between Australia and Russia over the lease of a Russian embassy property has raised many questions. Why did Australia decide to cancel the lease? What are the security concerns involved? And what does this mean for international property rights? Below, we explore the key details of this high-profile case and answer the most common questions about the dispute.
-
What Are the Legal and Political Battles Over Foreign Energy Leases and Sanctions?
Recent developments in international energy politics highlight complex legal and diplomatic battles over foreign leases and sanctions. From court rulings on embassy land to sanctions disrupting energy supplies, these issues raise important questions about sovereignty, security, and global markets. Below, we explore the key questions and answers surrounding these high-stakes disputes.
More on these topics
-
Australia, officially known as the Commonwealth of Australia, is a sovereign country comprising the mainland of the Australian continent, the island of Tasmania, and numerous smaller islands.
-
Anthony Norman Albanese ( AL-bə-NEE-zee or AL-bə-neez; born 2 March 1963) is an Australian politician who has served as the 31st prime minister of Australia since 2022. He has been the leader of the Labor Party since 2019 and the member of parliament.
-
Russia, or the Russian Federation, is a transcontinental country located in Eastern Europe and Northern Asia. Covering an area of 17,125,200 square kilometres, it is the largest country in the world by area, spanning more than one-eighth of the Earth's in
-
The High Court of Australia is Australia's apex court. It exercises original and appellate jurisdiction on matters specified within Australia’s Constitution.