What's happened
Fujitsu, the IT firm responsible for the Horizon system linked to wrongful prosecutions of UK sub-postmasters, has refused to set aside compensation funds, awaiting the final public inquiry report. MPs criticized the company for profiting from government contracts while avoiding financial redress for victims.
What's behind the headline?
The controversy surrounding Fujitsu highlights a complex interplay between corporate responsibility and government oversight. Despite admitting to bugs and errors in Horizon, Fujitsu refuses to commit to a compensation figure until the public inquiry concludes, citing the importance of Sir Wyn Williams' investigation. This stance raises questions about accountability, especially given the company's long-standing contracts and profits from UK government work.
The MPs' accusations that Fujitsu is behaving like a 'parasite' reflect frustration over the company's reluctance to fund redress, which is already backed by taxpayer money. The company's claim that ending contracts would be 'detrimental to society' appears to serve as a shield against financial responsibility, despite the clear role it played in the scandal.
The ongoing inquiry and the delayed justice for victims suggest that accountability remains elusive. The case underscores the need for stricter oversight of private companies involved in public services, especially when their failures cause profound social harm. The final report will likely determine the scale of Fujitsu's financial obligation and could set a precedent for corporate accountability in government contracts.
This story will continue to develop as the public inquiry releases its findings, potentially leading to legal and political repercussions for Fujitsu and the UK government. For victims, the resolution remains uncertain, but the scandal has already prompted calls for legislative changes to exonerate those affected by the faulty systems.
What the papers say
Sky News reports that Fujitsu has yet to commit to a redress figure, awaiting the public inquiry's final report, and faces mounting pressure from MPs to contribute financially. The Guardian highlights Fujitsu's denial of being a 'parasite' and emphasizes the company's profits from ongoing contracts, despite admitting to errors in Horizon. The Mirror details the personal toll on victims like Glenys and David Eaton, whose wrongful convictions and prison sentences have been overturned, yet compensation remains delayed. All sources underscore the scandal's severity and the ongoing debate over corporate responsibility and justice.
How we got here
The Horizon scandal involves faulty IT software developed by Fujitsu, which led to over 1,000 wrongful convictions of sub-postmasters. The UK government has allocated £1.8 billion for redress, but Fujitsu has yet to contribute financially, citing the ongoing public inquiry. The scandal has exposed systemic failures and has been described as one of the worst miscarriages of justice in UK history.
Go deeper
More on these topics
-
Sir Wyn Lewis Williams, FLSW is a Welsh judge who is the President of Welsh Tribunals. He had been a High Court judge from 2007 until his retirement on 10 February 2017.
-
Fujitsu Limited is a Japanese multinational information technology equipment and services company headquartered in Tokyo, Japan. In 2018, it was the world's fourth-largest IT services provider measured by global IT services revenue. Fortune named Fujitsu