What's happened
New York faces controversy over recent education guidance, including moves to eliminate timed math tests and promote phonics-based reading. Critics argue these policies undermine student performance, especially in math, where proficiency is declining. The debate highlights tensions between progressive approaches and traditional methods amid ongoing efforts to improve literacy and numeracy.
What's behind the headline?
The new guidance from New York's education authorities signals a significant shift away from evidence-based practices in math instruction. The rejection of timed tests and explicit instruction, championed by university researchers promoting equity and social justice, risks worsening math performance. Critics, including nearly 200 math academics, argue that these policies dismiss well-established methods like memorization and automaticity, which are crucial for mastering advanced math skills. The emphasis on exploratory learning and de-emphasizing practice could lead to a further widening of achievement gaps, especially among minority students. Meanwhile, the push for phonics-based reading aligns with proven strategies that have improved literacy scores in other states, but the resistance from some policymakers and educators suggests a fragmented approach to education reform. The ongoing debate underscores the tension between progressive educational philosophies and traditional, research-backed methods, with the potential for long-term impacts on student outcomes in New York.
What the papers say
The controversy over New York's education policies is highlighted by contrasting perspectives from different sources. The NY Post reports that the state's guidance, developed by University of Michigan researchers, promotes exploratory math methods and discourages timed testing, claiming these practices cause anxiety and hinder learning. Critics like SUNY-Albany professor Benjamin Solomon argue that these policies are 'critically flawed' and will lead to worse student performance, emphasizing that timed tests help build essential skills. Conversely, the AP News article discusses recent literacy reforms, including a law promoting phonics-based instruction, which has shown success in other states like Mississippi. While the Post criticizes the math guidance as ideologically driven, the AP highlights efforts to improve literacy through evidence-based methods, suggesting a more positive outlook on phonics initiatives. The debate reflects broader ideological divides over education, with some viewing progressive reforms as necessary and others seeing them as detrimental to student achievement.
How we got here
Recent years have seen a push in New York to reform education, emphasizing literacy through phonics and questioning traditional math practices like timed tests. Critics say these changes are driven by ideological agendas rather than evidence, risking further declines in student achievement. The controversy reflects broader national debates over education standards and methods.
Go deeper
Common question
-
Why Are NY Educators Banning Timed Math Quizzes?
Recent changes in New York's education policies have sparked widespread debate. The state is moving away from traditional timed math quizzes, citing concerns over student stress and anxiety. But what does this mean for student learning and performance? Below, we explore the reasons behind these bans, their impact on students, and what alternative assessment methods are being considered.
More on these topics