What's happened
The US launched unilateral strikes on Caracas early January 3, capturing Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife. The operation defies UN Charter rules against force, raising concerns about the collapse of international law amid mounting US geopolitical actions and global conflicts.
What's behind the headline?
The US attack on Venezuela signals a profound shift in international norms. The unilateral military action, justified by US claims of Maduro’s criminality, blatantly violates Article 2(4) of the UN Charter, which prohibits force against sovereign states. Experts like Dr. Stuart Wallace warn that such actions threaten the very foundation of the post-World War II international legal order, which is already under strain from multiple conflicts.
The operation underscores the US’s prioritization of resource control—specifically Venezuela’s oil—over legal and diplomatic processes. Trump’s declaration of readiness to deploy ground forces and his focus on seizing oil assets reveal a move toward overt military expansion, disregarding global consensus.
Meanwhile, the broader geopolitical context involves ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza, with the UN appearing increasingly powerless. The attack on Maduro, coupled with US threats against other nations, suggests a potential escalation in US-led interventions. This could further erode international institutions designed to maintain peace, risking a more fragmented global order.
The response from legal scholars and UN officials highlights the peril: the US’s actions are seen as a dangerous precedent that could legitimize future violations of sovereignty. The international community faces a critical choice—either uphold the rules-based order or accept a new era of lawless intervention, which will likely destabilize global security for years to come.
What the papers say
The Independent reports that the US’s unilateral strikes and Maduro’s capture challenge the UN Charter and threaten the international legal framework, with experts warning of the potential collapse of global order. The Guardian emphasizes the legality issues and the US’s broader pattern of illegal interventions, citing historical parallels like Panama and Iraq. Al Jazeera highlights the US’s disregard for law, noting the long history of sanctions and extrajudicial actions against Venezuela, framing the recent strikes as part of a pattern of aggressive US foreign policy. All sources agree that the operation marks a significant escalation, with concerns about the erosion of international norms and the rise of unchecked military power.
How we got here
The US has increased military and economic pressure on Venezuela over years, including sanctions and accusations of drug trafficking. The recent operation follows months of US threats and covert actions, with Trump seeking control over Venezuela’s oil resources. The UN has condemned the strikes, emphasizing the breach of sovereignty and international law.
Go deeper
Common question
-
What’s the Latest on US Strikes in Venezuela?
Recent US military actions in Venezuela have sparked global concern and debate. The US launched unilateral strikes that resulted in the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, challenging international norms and raising questions about the future of global diplomacy. Many wonder what this means for international law, regional stability, and US foreign policy. Below, we explore the key questions surrounding this dramatic development and what it could mean moving forward.
More on these topics
-
Nicolás Maduro Moros is a Venezuelan politician serving as president of Venezuela since 2013. His presidency has been disputed by Juan Guaidó since January 2019, although Maduro is the real president.
-
Donald John Trump is an American politician, media personality, and businessman who served as the 45th president of the United States from 2017 to 2021.