What's happened
The UK government has reversed its plan to make digital ID mandatory for right-to-work checks after widespread opposition. Instead, digital ID remains optional, with alternative digital documents accepted. The move follows public protests and political criticism, marking a significant U-turn in government policy on digital verification.
What's behind the headline?
The government’s reversal on mandatory digital ID reflects mounting public and political resistance to surveillance-based policies. The initial push aimed to streamline right-to-work checks and reduce fraud, but critics argued it threatened civil liberties and privacy. The shift to make digital ID optional indicates a recognition of these concerns, yet the government still advocates for digital verification methods like biometric passports. This U-turn underscores the difficulty of implementing intrusive digital policies in a climate of civil liberties activism and public skepticism. Moving forward, the government will likely focus on integrating digital verification as an optional tool rather than a mandatory requirement, balancing enforcement with privacy concerns. The controversy also highlights the broader challenge of digitising government services without eroding public trust.
What the papers say
The Scotsman reports that the UK government has abandoned mandatory digital ID plans following a petition signed by over 3 million people and widespread opposition from opposition parties and civil liberties groups. The article emphasizes the government’s commitment to digital right-to-work checks remaining, but now as an optional measure. The Mirror highlights the political sparring during Prime Minister Starmer’s PMQs, where he defended the policy shift amid accusations of U-turns. Both sources note the initial announcement in September 2025 and the subsequent public backlash, with critics like Silki Carlo from Big Brother Watch arguing the policy was fundamentally about surveillance rather than illegal working. The coverage underscores the political and civil liberties debates surrounding digital ID, illustrating the tension between enforcement and privacy, and the government’s strategic retreat in response to public pressure.
How we got here
Initially announced in September 2025 by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, the digital ID scheme aimed to combat illegal working by requiring digital proof of immigration status. The policy faced backlash over privacy concerns, civil liberties, and public opposition, leading to a government U-turn in January 2026. The scheme was part of broader efforts to digitise public services and tighten immigration controls, but its unpopularity prompted a reassessment.
Go deeper
More on these topics
-
Sir Keir Rodney Starmer KCB QC MP is a British politician and former lawyer who has served as Leader of the Labour Party and Leader of the Opposition since 2020. He has been Member of Parliament for Holborn and St Pancras since 2015.
-
Rachel Jane Reeves is a British Labour Party politician serving as Shadow Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and Shadow Minister for the Cabinet Office since 2020. She has been the Member of Parliament for Leeds West since 2010.
-
Olukemi Olufunto Adegoke Badenoch (née Adegoke; born 2 January 1980) is a British politician who has served as Leader of the Opposition and Leader of the Conservative Party since November 2024. Badenoch previously worked in the Cabinet for prime minister