What's happened
Since September, the US military has carried out nearly 30 strikes in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific, killing over 100 people. The strikes target vessels claimed to be involved in drug trafficking, but evidence remains unverified. The campaign faces legal and human rights scrutiny amid escalating tensions with Venezuela.
What's behind the headline?
The US's use of lethal force against vessels in international waters without verified evidence raises serious legal and ethical questions. These strikes, justified as anti-drug operations, resemble wartime tactics but lack the formal declaration of armed conflict, making them potentially unlawful under international law. The administration's framing of drug traffickers as 'terrorists' and 'combatants' echoes post-9/11 military strategies, yet critics argue this is a dangerous expansion of executive power. The absence of congressional approval and the use of language akin to the 'war on terror' suggest an attempt to bypass legal norms, risking a precedent for extrajudicial killings. The campaign's true motives may extend beyond drug interdiction, possibly aiming at regime change in Venezuela or control over regional resources. The escalation could deepen regional instability, provoke diplomatic conflicts, and undermine international legal standards. The recent nomination of Lt. Gen. Donovan indicates a shift toward more aggressive military policies, which could lead to further confrontations and civilian casualties.
What the papers say
The Independent reports that the US Southern Command claimed to have conducted lethal strikes on vessels involved in narco-trafficking, with no concrete evidence provided. France 24 echoes this, highlighting the lack of proof and the scrutiny from lawmakers and human rights activists who label these actions as extrajudicial killings. Helene Cooper of the New York Times details the political fallout, including the resignation of Admiral Holsey and the nomination of Lt. Gen. Donovan, emphasizing concerns over legality and potential for escalation. Al Jazeera provides a critical perspective, comparing these strikes to post-9/11 military actions and warning of dangerous legal precedents. Reuters notes the internal disagreements within the US military and the broader geopolitical implications, including the threat of a larger conflict with Venezuela. Overall, the coverage underscores the controversy surrounding the US's aggressive tactics, the lack of transparency, and the potential for long-term regional destabilization.
How we got here
The US military's Southern Command has conducted multiple strikes on vessels in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific since September, claiming they were involved in narco-trafficking. The operations are part of a broader effort to curb drug flow into the US and pressure Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. The campaign has resulted in over 100 deaths, with critics questioning the legality and transparency of the strikes, which lack concrete evidence and are seen by many as extrajudicial killings. The administration has also increased military presence in Latin America, including a large deployment of personnel and ships, amid rising tensions with Venezuela over sanctions and oil exports.
Go deeper
More on these topics
-
Nicolás Maduro Moros is a Venezuelan politician serving as president of Venezuela since 2013. His presidency has been disputed by Juan Guaidó since January 2019, although Maduro is the real president.
-
Donald John Trump is an American politician, media personality, and businessman who served as the 45th president of the United States from 2017 to 2021.
-
Venezuela, officially the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, is a country on the northern coast of South America, consisting of a continental landmass and many small islands and islets in the Caribbean Sea.
-
The United States Armed Forces are the military forces of the United States. U.S. federal law names six armed forces: the Army, Marine Corps, Navy, Air Force, Space Force, and Coast Guard. Since 1949, all of the armed forces, except the Coast Guard, have.
-
Peter Brian Hegseth (born June 6, 1980) is an American government official and former television personality who has served as the 29th United States secretary of defense since 2025.
Hegseth studied politics at Princeton University, where he was the publi
-
Alvin Holsey (born 1965) is a retired United States Navy admiral, and a naval aviator, who served as the commander of United States Southern Command from November 2024 to December 2025. He served as military deputy commander of the United States Southern.