Prague court clears Nagyová; Babiš immunity blocks trial

What's happened

AP and The Independent report that Andrej Babiš has not been sentenced as MPs have blocked lifting his immunity; Jana Nagyová has been fined and immunity lifted by the European Parliament, allowing a future trial. The case concerns EU subsidies tied to the Stork’s Nest farm and ownership transfers between Agrofert and family members.

What's behind the headline?

Reading the developments

The immunity vote keeps Babiš from standing trial while he remains prime minister, a status that is unlikely to change until 2029.
Nagyová faces a separate enforcement path, with the European Parliament removing her immunity and a local court fining her, though both decisions are subject to appeals.
The case revolving around a farm linked to EU subsidies highlights governance concerns over subsidy eligibility and ownership transfers among political-linked entities.

Forecast

If the term ends in 2029 without a trial, legal outcomes may depend on future parliamentary motions and potential reforms to immunity rules.
Any new coalition actions could influence how corruption cases are handled in the next government.

How we got here

The case centers on EU subsidies tied to the Stork’s Nest farm, once owned by Babiš’s Agrofert conglomerate, and later transferred to family members before Agrofert regained ownership. Parliament’s March vote blocked lifting Babiš’s immunity, delaying any trial until 2029 after his term ends. Nagyová, a current MEP, has immunity lifted by the European Parliament and has been fined locally.

Our analysis

AP News reports from Mon, 04 May 2026 12:41:56 +0100 detail Babiš’s immunity and Nagyová’s status; The Independent echoes the same facts and adds the broader coalition context and Ukraine/EU policy stance.

Go deeper

Will Babiš face trial after 2029 if immunity is not lifted earlier?
How will Nagyová’s immunity status affect EU parliamentary dynamics?
What does this imply for Czech governance and EU subsidy oversight?