What's happened
European NATO allies are being urged to take greater responsibility for their defense amid US calls for a shift towards modern, credible military capabilities. US officials emphasize NATO's core purpose remains intact, but stress the need for Europe to lead on homeland security, with the US focusing on global and Pacific priorities. This comes as NATO adjusts command roles and boosts defense spending commitments.
What's behind the headline?
NATO is undergoing a strategic recalibration driven by US priorities and evolving global threats. US officials, including Elbridge Colby, stress that NATO must shift from post-Cold War complacency to a focus on credible, ready forces capable of deterring large-scale conflicts. This entails European nations assuming primary responsibility for homeland defense, as the US concentrates on the Indo-Pacific. The US's reaffirmation of NATO's importance, despite shifting command roles and increased European leadership, signals a pragmatic approach rather than retreat. The emphasis on increased defense spending—targeting 3.5% of GDP by 2035—reflects a recognition that mere commitments are insufficient without credible military output. The US's focus on modernizing NATO's command structure, including shifting maritime and land responsibilities to European nations, aims to foster greater European autonomy while maintaining US strategic dominance. This realignment is likely to strengthen NATO's resilience but may also deepen tensions over burden-sharing and strategic priorities. The overarching goal is to ensure NATO remains a credible deterrent in a multipolar world, with the US maintaining leadership while empowering European allies to lead on their own turf.
What the papers say
The articles from Sky News and the New York Times reveal a consensus on NATO's strategic shift, emphasizing increased European responsibility and US focus on the Indo-Pacific. Sky News highlights US officials' calls for Europe to move beyond rhetoric to credible military output, with Colby stressing the importance of readiness and modern force structure. The New York Times underscores bipartisan US support for NATO, framing it as a 'force-multiplier' that enhances US global influence and security. Both sources note the US's reaffirmation of NATO's core role, despite changes in command and spending. However, Sky News also points out concerns about slow UK defense spending and unresolved budget issues, contrasting with US assertions of increased commitment. The NYT's perspective emphasizes the political importance of NATO's bipartisan support, especially amid questions raised by President Trump’s previous comments and recent US policy shifts. Overall, the coverage suggests a deliberate US strategy to modernize NATO, balancing burden-sharing with maintaining US dominance, while European allies are urged to step up their defense efforts.
How we got here
Recent NATO summits and meetings have highlighted a shift in US and European defense strategies. The US has long advocated for European allies to increase their military spending and take on more responsibility for their own defense, especially in Europe. This is part of a broader effort to modernize NATO, emphasizing credible military strength over bureaucratic stasis, and to adapt to a changing global threat landscape, including potential conflicts involving China and Russia. The US remains committed to NATO's core principles but is increasingly emphasizing strategic pragmatism and burden-sharing.
Go deeper
Common question
-
What Does NATO's Reinforcement of US Command Mean for Global Security?
Recent shifts in NATO's leadership structure have raised important questions about the future of international alliances and global security. As the US maintains its command role while European allies take on more operational responsibilities, many wonder what this means for NATO's unity and effectiveness. Below, we explore key questions about these changes and their broader implications.
-
How is NATO changing as the US calls for more European defense?
Recent shifts in NATO's strategy reflect the US urging European allies to take greater responsibility for their own defense. This move aims to modernize NATO, boost European military capabilities, and adapt to a changing global security landscape. But what does this mean for Europe, the US, and global security? Below, we explore the key questions about NATO's evolving role and what it means for the future of international security.
More on these topics
-
Elbridge Andrew Colby (born December 30, 1979) is an American national security policy professional who is currently the under secretary of defense for policy. He previously served as deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force developmen
-
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization, also called the North Atlantic Alliance, is an intergovernmental military alliance between 30 North American and European countries.
-
Donald John Trump is an American politician, media personality, and businessman who served as the 45th president of the United States from 2017 to 2021.