What's happened
Leaders from over 30 countries, including the US, France, and UK, met in Paris to discuss security guarantees for Ukraine amid ongoing conflict. They agreed on deploying multinational forces post-ceasefire, but key issues like territorial concessions remain unresolved. The US and European nations aim to support Ukraine’s defense and reconstruction efforts.
What's behind the headline?
The Paris coalition signals a strategic shift toward formalized security guarantees for Ukraine, aiming to deter future Russian aggression. The agreement to deploy multinational forces post-ceasefire underscores a commitment to Ukraine’s sovereignty, but the unresolved territorial issues, especially regarding Donbas, highlight persistent tensions. The US’s cautious support—excluding explicit commitments to support the multinational force in case of renewed attack—reflects underlying geopolitical hesitations. European leaders, notably Macron and Starmer, emphasize the importance of military reassurance and diplomatic negotiations, yet the divergence over troop deployment and territorial concessions reveals a fragile consensus. The ongoing fighting, with Russian attacks and Ukrainian drone defenses, indicates that a ceasefire remains distant, and the risk of escalation persists. The coalition’s success hinges on resolving the territorial dispute and establishing clear, enforceable security arrangements, which will determine whether this effort leads to lasting peace or merely a temporary pause in hostilities.
What the papers say
The Al Jazeera article details the recent Paris coalition meeting, highlighting the joint declarations and the deployment plans discussed by leaders like Zelensky, Macron, and Starmer. It emphasizes the cautious optimism and the unresolved territorial issues. The Moscow Times provides context on the political dynamics, noting the US and European efforts to formalize security guarantees amid ongoing conflict, and underscores the strategic importance of these agreements. Both sources reveal a complex landscape where diplomatic promises are intertwined with military realities, and the true impact depends on Russia’s response and the willingness of all parties to compromise. The contrasting tone between the two reflects the tension: Al Jazeera focuses on the tangible commitments and the potential for peace, while The Moscow Times highlights the underlying uncertainties and geopolitical tensions that threaten to undermine these efforts.
How we got here
The meeting follows nearly four years of conflict since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Western countries have sought to bolster Ukraine’s security through military and diplomatic support, while Russia opposes NATO involvement and territorial concessions. The recent coalition gathering in Paris aims to solidify security guarantees and prepare for potential peace negotiations.
Go deeper
More on these topics
-
Emmanuel Jean-Michel Frédéric Macron is a French politician who has been President of France and ex officio Co-Prince of Andorra since 14 May 2017.
-
Sir Keir Rodney Starmer KCB QC MP is a British politician and former lawyer who has served as Leader of the Labour Party and Leader of the Opposition since 2020. He has been Member of Parliament for Holborn and St Pancras since 2015.
-
Ukraine is a country in Eastern Europe. It is the second-largest European country after Russia, which borders it to the east and northeast.