What's happened
The European Court of Justice has ruled that pets transported by airlines are classified as baggage, limiting compensation for lost animals. The case involved a dog, Mona, lost during a flight from Buenos Aires to Barcelona in 2019. The ruling impacts future pet travel claims under EU law.
What's behind the headline?
The ECJ's ruling solidifies the legal classification of pets as baggage during air transport, which significantly limits compensation for lost animals. This decision underscores the importance of making a 'special declaration of interest' when traveling with pets, though legal experts argue this is impractical for most owners. The ruling reveals a broader issue: the lack of specific legal protections for animals in transit, which could lead to more cases of animals being undervalued or inadequately protected. Airlines will likely continue to treat pets as cargo, emphasizing the need for owners to consider additional insurance or declarations if they seek higher compensation. This decision also highlights a gap in animal welfare considerations within international aviation law, which the ECJ's interpretation fails to address. Moving forward, advocacy for clearer, animal-specific protections in air travel law is inevitable, and this ruling may serve as a catalyst for legislative change. The case exemplifies the tension between legal liability frameworks and evolving societal values around animal welfare, with the ECJ prioritizing legal consistency over animal-specific protections.
What the papers say
The Guardian emphasizes that the ECJ's decision sets a precedent for pet owners, highlighting that without a special declaration, compensation is limited to €1,578.82. Politico notes that the ruling is a setback for owners seeking higher damages, as it confirms pets are classified as baggage under EU rules. Both sources agree that the ruling underscores the importance of declaring the contents of pet carriers, though legal experts argue this is rarely practical. The South China Morning Post provides detailed background on the case, including the owner's emotional distress and the legal arguments presented, and notes the court's emphasis on animal welfare not overriding the baggage classification. The articles collectively reveal a consensus that the ruling limits compensation but also expose ongoing debates about animal rights and airline liability.
How we got here
The case originated from a 2019 incident where a dog named Mona escaped during transport on an Iberia flight. The owner, Grisel Ortiz, sought €5,000 in damages, but the airline argued liability was limited under the Montreal Convention, which treats pets as baggage unless a special declaration is made. The case was escalated to the European Court of Justice, which clarified that pets are considered baggage for liability purposes unless a higher declaration is made at check-in.
Go deeper
More on these topics