What's happened
Sunjay Kapur’s death has triggered a high-profile inheritance battle involving his mother, widow, and ex-wife, with disputes over wills, frozen assets, and control of the Sona Comstar empire. The conflict highlights generational and gender dynamics in India’s business elite.
What's behind the headline?
The Kapur inheritance saga exposes the fragility of family-controlled business empires in India. The dispute underscores how gender and generational conflicts can threaten corporate stability, especially when legal claims challenge established succession plans. Rani Kapur’s assertion of her late husband's will and her accusations of coercion reveal underlying tensions about loyalty and legacy. Priya Kapur’s appointment signifies a shift in power, but her position is contested, illustrating how family disputes can spill into corporate governance. The involvement of alleged half-siblings seeking trusts worth hundreds of millions adds a layer of legal complexity that could set precedents for succession disputes in India’s private sector. This case foreshadows increased scrutiny of family governance and the importance of transparent succession planning to prevent such conflicts from destabilizing valuable assets. The outcome will likely influence how Indian business dynasties manage internal disputes and succession, with potential ripple effects across similar family-controlled firms.
What the papers say
The Gulf News article by Manjusha Radhakrishnan provides a detailed account of the ongoing inheritance dispute, emphasizing the personal and legal conflicts among Sunjay Kapur’s family members. It highlights the roles of his mother, widow, and ex-wife, and the broader implications for India’s business dynasties. The South China Morning Post articles add context by illustrating how family disputes over inheritance are not unique to India, drawing parallels with cases involving Chinese entrepreneurs like Kelly Zong and the Wahaha family feud. These sources contrast the legal and familial complexities, with SCMP noting the potential impact on corporate governance and the reputation of family businesses. Both sources underscore the importance of succession planning and the risks posed by unresolved family conflicts, especially in high-value enterprises. The coverage from both outlets emphasizes that these disputes are not just personal but have significant implications for corporate stability and investor confidence.
How we got here
Sunjay Kapur, chairman of Sona Comstar, died unexpectedly in June 2025, sparking a fierce inheritance dispute among his family members. His mother Rani Kapur claims coercion and disputes the official account of his death, invoking her late husband's will. Priya Sachdev Kapur, his widow, has been appointed to the board, despite opposition. The conflict is rooted in complex family dynamics, legacy concerns, and control over a Rs300 billion empire, reflecting broader issues of succession and gender roles in Indian business families.
Go deeper
Common question
-
What’s happening with Wahaha’s family feud? How could this affect the company’s future?
The ongoing family dispute within Wahaha, one of China’s leading beverage companies, has raised questions about its stability and future prospects. Family conflicts over control and succession are increasingly common in large corporations, especially those with deep roots in family ownership. Below, we explore the key players, potential impacts, and broader implications of this high-profile feud.
-
What Are the Key Issues in the Wahaha Inheritance Dispute and What Does It Mean for Chinese Business?
The Wahaha inheritance dispute has captured attention across China and beyond, highlighting complex family dynamics and corporate governance challenges. As heirs clash over control and trusts, questions arise about how such disputes reflect broader issues in Chinese business culture. Below, we explore the main questions surrounding this high-profile case and what lessons can be learned for family-run enterprises in China and Asia.
More on these topics