What's happened
David Brooks announced his departure from The New York Times, marking the end of his journalism tenure. The episode features a conversation with Robert Siegel and E.J. Dionne, reflecting on his career and the future of journalism as he steps away from the platform.
What's behind the headline?
Brooks' departure signals a significant shift in the landscape of opinion journalism. His role as a prominent voice in political commentary will leave a gap in the media. The episode underscores the transition in journalism from traditional outlets to new platforms, emphasizing the importance of diverse perspectives. Brooks' exit also raises questions about the future of opinion columns and the evolving relationship between journalists and their audiences. His departure may accelerate changes in how political commentary is produced and consumed, with potential impacts on public discourse and media trust. This moment reflects broader trends of media consolidation and the shifting power dynamics within journalism, suggesting that the industry will continue to evolve rapidly in the coming years.
What the papers say
The New York Times provides a detailed account of Brooks' career and his decision to leave, emphasizing his influence on political commentary. The episode transcript highlights his reflections on journalism's future and his legacy. Contrasting opinions from media analysts suggest that Brooks' departure could either mark the end of an era or open space for new voices to emerge, reflecting ongoing debates about media diversity and the role of opinion journalism in shaping public opinion.
How we got here
David Brooks, a longtime columnist for The New York Times, announced his departure in February 2026. His career spanned decades, during which he became known for his political commentary and cultural analysis. The episode of 'The Opinions' marks his final appearance, highlighting his influence on American political discourse and journalism.
Go deeper
More on these topics