What's happened
The UK government has announced a ban on new oil and gas exploration licenses in the North Sea, allowing only tie-back projects linked to existing fields. The move aims to balance energy needs, job protection, and climate commitments amid industry opposition and fiscal tensions.
What's behind the headline?
The UK’s North Sea policy reflects a complex balancing act. While Labour’s manifesto promised to end new licenses, the government’s decision to permit tie-back projects indicates a pragmatic shift driven by industry pressures and energy security concerns. The introduction of 'transitional energy certificates' allows limited new drilling, but only in areas adjacent to existing fields, which contain a fraction of the reserves compared to major projects like Rosebank. This signals a move away from endless exploration towards a managed decline, acknowledging the North Sea’s aging infrastructure and declining reserves.
However, the policy creates a contradiction: looser licensing is intended to support industry and jobs, yet the continued windfall tax and high tax rates (up to 78%) are discouraging investment and accelerating decline. Industry groups warn that these policies will lead to further job losses and reduced investment, with North Sea spending dropping significantly since 2015. The government’s approach appears fragmented, with no clear production targets or comprehensive plan for a just transition.
The decision on Rosebank, a major oilfield, remains pivotal. While the government could approve it without breaching manifesto promises, critics argue that approving such projects contradicts climate commitments and the broader goal of ending new fossil fuel extraction. The policy’s future will depend on how effectively the government manages industry concerns, environmental goals, and economic realities, but the current trajectory suggests a gradual decline in North Sea activity, with significant implications for energy independence and climate policy.
What the papers say
The Guardian’s articles by Nils Pratley, Jillian Ambrose, and Helena Horton provide a detailed overview of the UK government’s North Sea strategy, highlighting the political and economic tensions involved. Pratley notes the contradictions between licensing and taxation policies, emphasizing the risk of industry decline. Ambrose discusses the government’s pragmatic approach, balancing job protection with climate commitments, and criticizes the persistent windfall tax. Horton contextualizes the policy within the UK’s broader climate ambitions, referencing Ed Miliband’s recent statements and international commitments from Cop30. The articles collectively illustrate a government caught between industry lobbying, environmental goals, and fiscal constraints, with industry warnings of accelerated decline and reduced revenues.
How we got here
Labour's 2024 manifesto committed to ending new North Sea oil and gas licenses. However, recent industry pressures and the recognition that fossil fuels will remain part of the UK's energy mix have led the government to introduce 'transitional energy certificates' for drilling near existing fields. This approach seeks to extend the lifespan of current assets while managing environmental concerns. The policy shift follows a broader debate over balancing energy security, economic growth, and climate goals, with the government aiming to support jobs and industry stability during the transition.
Go deeper
More on these topics
-
Rachel Jane Reeves is a British Labour Party politician serving as Shadow Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and Shadow Minister for the Cabinet Office since 2020. She has been the Member of Parliament for Leeds West since 2010.
-
Edward Samuel Miliband is a British politician serving as Shadow Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy since 2020, and has served as Member of Parliament for Doncaster North since 2005.
-
Tessa Khan is an environmental lawyer residing in the United Kingdom. She cofounded and is co-director of the Climate Litigation Network, which supports legal cases related to climate change mitigation and climate justice.