What's happened
The UK government announced it will review its decision not to compensate women born in the 1950s affected by pension age increases. This follows new evidence and court proceedings, with officials stating the review aims for fairness but not guaranteeing payouts. Campaigners see this as a major step forward.
What's behind the headline?
The government’s decision to revisit the pension compensation stance signals a significant shift driven by legal pressure and new evidence. The rediscovery of a 2007 DWP evaluation, which was not initially considered, raises questions about transparency and accountability. Campaigners argue that many women planned their retirements based on expected pension ages, and the delay has caused financial hardship. The government’s cautious language suggests that while a review is underway, the outcome remains uncertain. This move could lead to a broader reassessment of how government maladministration is addressed, especially in cases affecting vulnerable populations. The political implications include potential criticism of past policies and a test of government responsiveness to legal and public pressure. The next steps will determine whether these women receive compensation or if the government maintains its current stance, impacting public trust in pension policy and government accountability.
What the papers say
The Independent reports that the government is reconsidering its refusal to compensate women affected by pension age changes, citing new evidence and court proceedings. The Scotsman highlights campaigners' optimism and calls for swift action, emphasizing the legal context and political criticism. Sky News notes the rediscovery of a 2007 DWP evaluation and the government’s cautious approach, stressing that the review does not guarantee compensation. All sources agree that this development marks a potential turning point, but the final decision remains uncertain, with campaigners urging immediate redress and political figures criticizing delays.
How we got here
Since 2010, the state pension age for women increased from 60 to 65, then to 66, with little warning, affecting around 3.6 million women. The government faced criticism for poor communication and delays, with the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman recommending compensation. Court proceedings and new evidence have prompted a government review of its previous refusal to pay.
Go deeper
More on these topics
-
Women Against State Pension Inequality is a voluntary UK-based organisation founded in 2015 that campaigns against the way in which the state pension age for men and women was equalised.
-
Patrick Bosco McFadden is a British politician who has been Member of Parliament for Wolverhampton South East since 2005. A member of the Labour Party, he was briefly Shadow Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills in 2010 and Shadow Ministe
-
The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman comprises the offices of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration and the Health Service Commissioner for England.
-
Elizabeth Louise Kendall is a British Labour Party politician who has been Member of Parliament for Leicester West since 2010.
Kendall was educated at Queens' College, Cambridge where she read history.