What's happened
The IRC is expanding a program to reduce postpartum hemorrhage in conflict-affected regions of South Sudan and Burkina Faso. Using blood-collection drapes and drugs like misoprostol, the initiative aims to improve maternal survival rates despite funding cuts and healthcare challenges.
What's behind the headline?
Critical Analysis
The expansion of the maternal health program in South Sudan and Burkina Faso highlights a strategic shift towards pragmatic, resource-efficient interventions in conflict zones. The use of blood-collection drapes, recommended by WHO, and the distribution of misoprostol for home births are evidence-based measures that will likely save lives.
However, the program's success hinges on overcoming significant logistical and safety challenges. Reuse of medical supplies like blood drapes could pose infection risks, especially in unstable environments. The controversial use of misoprostol, a drug also associated with abortion in some contexts, may face resistance in conservative societies, potentially limiting its acceptance.
This initiative underscores the importance of adaptable healthcare strategies in crisis settings, but it also exposes the fragility of aid-dependent health systems. The reduced funding and ongoing conflict suggest that sustainable, long-term solutions remain elusive, and the program's impact will depend on local buy-in and effective implementation.
Looking ahead, the project could serve as a model for rapid deployment of maternal health interventions in other conflict zones, provided logistical hurdles are addressed and community engagement is prioritized. The focus on swift, measurable outcomes like reduced hemorrhage and mortality will be critical to securing ongoing support and scaling efforts.
What the papers say
The Independent reports on the IRC's scaled-back program, emphasizing the challenges faced due to aid cuts and conflict. The article highlights the use of WHO-recommended blood collection drapes and the controversial deployment of misoprostol, noting the potential risks and benefits. It also contextualizes the broader health crisis in South Sudan and Burkina Faso, where infrastructure damage and aid withdrawal have severely impacted maternal care.
Contrasting perspectives are less prominent in this piece, but the focus remains on the pragmatic adaptation of proven medical interventions in difficult environments. The article underscores the importance of innovative, resource-efficient solutions in crisis zones, aligning with global health priorities. For further insights, readers are encouraged to explore WHO guidelines on postpartum hemorrhage management and reports from the UNFPA on maternal health in conflict settings.
How we got here
Postpartum hemorrhage is a leading cause of maternal death worldwide. The IRC's Safer Births in Crisis project was initially set to run in seven countries with $10 million but was scaled back to $4 million, focusing on South Sudan and Burkina Faso due to aid cuts and ongoing conflicts. These regions face severe healthcare infrastructure damage, low access to clinics, and high maternal mortality, exacerbated by US aid withdrawal in 2025.
Go deeper
More on these topics