What's happened
The EU has agreed to classify certain countries as safe for asylum purposes, enabling faster processing and returns. Critics warn this could endanger migrants and bypass legal protections, raising concerns about human rights and border enforcement as the new rules take effect in June 2026.
What's behind the headline?
The EU's move to designate certain countries as safe for asylum processing signals a shift towards stricter border enforcement. This policy will likely accelerate deportations and reduce asylum claims from these nations, but it risks undermining protections for vulnerable migrants. Critics argue that the criteria for 'safe' countries are too broad, potentially including nations with ongoing violence or persecution, which could lead to wrongful returns. The agreement opens the door to establishing return hubs outside the EU, where migrants may face inhumane treatment with minimal oversight. This approach reflects a political desire to appear tough on migration, but it may erode the EU's commitment to human rights. The new rules will likely increase tensions between member states and human rights advocates, as well as complicate legal challenges. The re-examination of cases like Alaa Hamoudi’s highlights ongoing issues with border practices and the role of Frontex, the EU border agency, in alleged pushbacks and expulsions. Overall, the policy will reshape migration enforcement, but its success depends on balancing border security with legal and ethical obligations.
What the papers say
The Independent reports that the new EU asylum rules classify countries as safe if they lack relevant circumstances like violence, enabling fast-tracked asylum requests and returns. Critics, including Amnesty International and refugee organizations, warn that these measures could endanger migrants and bypass legal protections. AP News highlights the legal challenge in the case of Alaa Hamoudi, whose pushback from Greece to Turkey was scrutinized by the EU Court of Justice, marking a significant precedent against illegal expulsions. The court's decision to re-examine Hamoudi’s case underscores ongoing concerns about Frontex’s role in border violations. Meanwhile, The Times of Israel covers the political fallout in Italy, where the release of a controversial figure, Shahin, sparked protests and government criticism, illustrating the complex intersection of migration, security, and political narratives in Europe.
How we got here
In 2024, the EU endorsed reforms to overhaul its asylum system, aiming to address issues from the 2015 migrant crisis. The new Pact on Migration and Asylum, set to activate in June 2026, introduces criteria for deeming countries safe, allowing for expedited returns of asylum seekers from these nations. The reforms aim to strengthen border controls and shared responsibility among member states, amid ongoing debates over human rights and migration policies.
Go deeper
Common question
-
Why is the EU deadlocked over Russian assets for Ukraine?
The European Union is currently facing a complex standoff over how to use frozen Russian assets to fund Ukraine's future. While some member states push for a reparations loan backed by these assets, others like Belgium fear legal and financial risks. This deadlock raises questions about international law, potential retaliation from Russia, and what this means for Ukraine's budget plans. Below, we explore the key issues and what they could mean for the future of EU-Ukraine relations.
More on these topics
-
The European Union is a political and economic union of 27 member states that are located primarily in Europe. Its members have a combined area of 4,233,255.3 km² and an estimated total population of about 447 million.
-
The European Border and Coast Guard Agency, commonly known as Frontex (from French frontières extérieures, "external borders"), is an agency of the European Union headquartered in Warsaw, Poland. In coordination with the border and coast guards of membe