What's happened
Micayla Pretti defends her brother Alex, a nurse shot by Border Patrol agents during a federal operation in Minneapolis. Video evidence contradicts authorities' claims, showing Pretti unarmed and attempting to help a woman. The incident has sparked protests and political backlash amid conflicting narratives.
What's behind the headline?
The narrative surrounding Alex Pretti's death reveals a stark contrast between official government claims and eyewitness evidence. Federal authorities initially portrayed Pretti as a threat, claiming he approached with a gun and resisted arrest, justifying the use of deadly force. However, multiple videos and witness testimonies show he was unarmed, holding only a phone, and was trying to help a woman when he was shot. This discrepancy suggests a deliberate attempt by the Trump administration to frame the incident as self-defense, aiming to justify the shooting and demonize Pretti as a 'domestic terrorist.' The administration's early narrative, reinforced by senior officials calling Pretti an 'assassin' and 'terrorist,' appears designed to sway public opinion and deflect criticism of law enforcement conduct. The incident underscores ongoing tensions over immigration enforcement tactics, police accountability, and political manipulation of facts. The potential for further investigations to clarify the truth remains, but current evidence indicates a likely misrepresentation by authorities. The event is likely to fuel protests and deepen divisions over immigration policies and law enforcement practices in Minneapolis and beyond.
What the papers say
The New York Times highlights how the Trump administration quickly advanced a narrative portraying Pretti as a threat, despite video evidence contradicting their claims. Conversely, The Mirror emphasizes eyewitness accounts and family statements that depict Pretti as unarmed and attempting to help others, criticizing the administration's smear campaign. The articles illustrate a broader pattern of political figures using early narratives to shape public perception, often at odds with available evidence. The Times notes that the administration's portrayal aims to justify the use of deadly force, while The Mirror underscores the importance of independent investigations to uncover the truth. Both sources reveal how political motives influence the framing of this incident, with the administration seeking to portray the victim as a villain to justify the police action, and critics calling for accountability and transparency.
How we got here
The incident occurred during a federal immigration enforcement operation in Minneapolis on January 24, 2026. Alex Pretti, a lawful gun owner and nurse, was shot and killed after federal agents pursued a suspect into a doughnut shop. Witnesses and family members dispute the official account, which initially claimed Pretti approached with a gun and resisted arrest. Video footage shows Pretti holding a phone, not a firearm, and attempting to assist a woman when he was shot. The event has intensified tensions over immigration enforcement and police conduct in Minneapolis.
Go deeper
More on these topics