What's happened
On February 12, 2026, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized the repeal of the 2009 'endangerment finding' that classified greenhouse gases as threats to public health. Led by the Trump administration and EPA head Lee Zeldin, this marks the largest climate deregulation in US history, removing federal greenhouse gas emission standards for vehicles and threatening broader climate regulations. The rollback aims to reduce costs for automakers and fossil fuel industries but faces strong opposition from environmental groups and legal challenges.
What's behind the headline?
The End of a Regulatory Pillar
The repeal of the 2009 endangerment finding dismantles the legal foundation for nearly all federal climate regulations in the US. This move is not merely a policy shift but a fundamental redefinition of the government's role in addressing climate change.
Political and Economic Drivers
The Trump administration, backed by fossil fuel interests, frames this rollback as a victory for economic growth and consumer savings, citing projected $1.3 trillion in regulatory cost reductions and lower vehicle prices. However, these claims overlook the long-term economic and health costs of climate change, including increased disaster recovery expenses and public health burdens.
Legal and Environmental Consequences
Removing the endangerment finding jeopardizes regulations on emissions from vehicles, power plants, and industrial sources. It also opens the door to legal challenges and uncertainty, as future administrations would need to re-establish the scientific and legal basis for climate regulations, a process likely to be protracted and contentious.
Global and Domestic Context
While the US retreats from climate commitments, China continues to invest heavily in clean energy, though its emissions trajectory remains uncertain. Domestically, states like California maintain aggressive climate agendas, creating a patchwork of policies that complicate national coherence.
Impact on the Public
The rollback will likely lead to increased greenhouse gas emissions, exacerbating climate-related disasters such as wildfires, floods, and heatwaves, which have already caused significant health and economic damages. The decision shifts the burden of these impacts onto communities and future generations.
Forecast
Legal battles will ensue, and political polarization around climate policy will deepen. The US may face challenges in international climate diplomacy and risk falling behind in clean energy innovation. Consumers may see short-term cost relief but face greater long-term risks from climate impacts.
What the papers say
The New York Post highlights the Trump administration's framing of the repeal as a restoration of common sense and economic relief, quoting President Trump calling it "the largest deregulatory action in American history" and emphasizing savings for consumers and the auto industry. Miranda Devine's column celebrates the rollback as a rejection of what she terms "climate shucksters" and a victory for fossil fuels, noting the administration's support for coal and fossil fuel industries.
In contrast, The Guardian and AP News provide a critical perspective, emphasizing the environmental and public health risks. The Guardian reports on the $115 billion cost of climate disasters in the US last year and quotes Democratic Senator Sheldon Whitehouse calling the repeal "corruption, plain and simple." AP News underscores the scientific consensus on climate change's dangers, citing studies linking greenhouse gases to increased mortality and extreme weather, and warns that the repeal undermines decades of progress.
The Japan Times offers a detailed legal and regulatory analysis, noting the repeal's potential to trigger lawsuits and the reluctance of some industry groups to publicly endorse the move due to legal uncertainties. It also highlights the EPA's claim of $1.3 trillion in savings versus environmental groups' warnings of higher costs and harms.
France 24 reports on the administration's legal and scientific arguments for the repeal, including claims that greenhouse gases should not be regulated as traditional pollutants due to their global effects, and notes the disbanding of a controversial Energy Department working group skeptical of human-caused climate change.
Together, these sources illustrate a deeply polarized debate, with the administration and its supporters emphasizing economic benefits and deregulation, while critics warn of environmental, health, and legal consequences.
How we got here
The 2009 endangerment finding, established under President Obama, legally recognized greenhouse gases as pollutants endangering public health, enabling federal climate regulations under the Clean Air Act. This finding underpinned vehicle emission standards and other climate policies. The Trump administration, opposing these regulations, initiated the repeal to reduce regulatory costs and promote fossil fuel development, sparking widespread debate over climate policy and environmental protection.
Go deeper
- What are the legal implications of repealing the endangerment finding?
- How will this repeal affect US climate change efforts?
- What are the economic impacts of removing vehicle emission standards?
Common question
-
Why Are Nevada's Greenhouse Gas Emissions Staying Flat?
Nevada's climate progress has hit a plateau, with emissions expected to remain steady in the coming years. Many wonder what factors are behind this stagnation and what it means for the state's environmental goals. In this page, we'll explore why Nevada's emissions aren't decreasing as hoped, the political and policy hurdles involved, how Nevada compares to other states, and what steps could help accelerate climate action.
-
What Does the EPA's Reversal of the 2009 Climate Finding Mean for the US?
On February 12, 2026, the US EPA officially rescinded the 2009 'endangerment finding' that classified greenhouse gases as threats to public health. This historic move marks the largest deregulatory action in US history, raising questions about its impact on climate policies, regulations, and the environment. Below, we explore what this change entails and how it might affect the future of climate action in the US.
-
What Does the EPA's Repeal of the Climate Endangerment Finding Mean for US Climate Policy?
The recent decision by the EPA to repeal the 2009 climate endangerment finding marks a significant shift in US environmental policy. This move raises questions about its impact on climate regulation, the environment, and public health. Below, we explore the key implications of this change and what it could mean for the future of climate action in the US.
More on these topics
-
Donald John Trump is an American politician, media personality, and businessman who served as the 45th president of the United States from 2017 to 2021.
-
Lee Michael Zeldin is an American lawyer and politician currently serving as a Republican member of the U.S. House of Representatives. He has represented New York's 1st congressional district since taking office in January 2015.
-
The Environmental Protection Agency is an independent executive agency of the United States federal government tasked with environmental protection matters.
-
Barack Hussein Obama II is an American attorney and politician who served as the 44th president of the United States from 2009 to 2017. A member of the Democratic Party, he was the first African American President of the United States. He previously serve
-
Joseph Robinette Biden Jr. is an American politician who is the 46th and current president of the United States. A member of the Democratic Party, he served as the 47th vice president from 2009 to 2017 and represented Delaware in the United States Senate
-
Karoline Leavitt (born August 24, 1997) is an American political spokesperson who has served as the 36th White House press secretary since 2025. A member of the Republican Party, she was the party's nominee in the 2022 election for New Hampshire's 1st...
-
Present-day climate change includes both global warming—the ongoing increase in global average temperature—and its wider effects on Earth's climate system. Climate change in a broader sense also includes previous long-term changes to Earth's climate..
-
Gavin Christopher Newsom is an American politician and businessman who is the 40th governor of California, serving since January 2019.