What's happened
On January 21, 2026, the US Supreme Court heard arguments over former President Trump's unprecedented attempt to fire Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, citing unproven mortgage fraud allegations she denies. The court appeared skeptical of the administration's request to lift a lower court injunction preventing her immediate removal, raising concerns about the Fed's independence and economic impact. A ruling is expected by June.
What's behind the headline?
The Stakes of Fed Independence
The Supreme Court's scrutiny of Trump's attempt to fire Lisa Cook marks a pivotal moment for the Federal Reserve's autonomy. The Fed's unique quasi-private status was designed to shield monetary policy from political whims, ensuring decisions are based on economic evidence rather than presidential preference.
Political Pressure vs Institutional Integrity
Trump's aggressive tactics—including public insults toward Fed Chair Jerome Powell and a Justice Department investigation into Powell—reflect a broader effort to centralize control over the Fed. Yet, the court's skepticism signals a potential boundary against unchecked executive power, especially given the Fed's critical role in the US and global economy.
Legal Ambiguities and Precedents
The case exposes gaps in the Federal Reserve Act, particularly the undefined "for cause" removal standard. The court's decision will clarify whether past alleged misconduct, even if unproven or predating appointment, justifies removal without due process. This ruling will set a precedent affecting not only the Fed but other independent agencies.
Economic Implications
Allowing a president to remove Fed governors at will risks politicizing interest rate decisions, potentially destabilizing markets and undermining investor confidence. Conversely, upholding the Fed's independence preserves a critical check on political interference, supporting stable economic policy.
Forecast
The Supreme Court is likely to uphold some form of protection for Fed governors, reinforcing the bank's independence. However, the ruling may leave ambiguities that future administrations could exploit. The decision will influence the balance of power between the executive branch and independent agencies for years to come.
What the papers say
Lauren Aratani of The Guardian highlights Trump's unprecedented and aggressive campaign against the Fed, noting his insults toward Chair Powell and the criminal investigation initiated by the Justice Department. Aratani emphasizes the Supreme Court's skepticism during oral arguments and the potential risks to agency independence.
Al Jazeera reports on the court's reluctance to allow Cook's immediate removal, quoting justices questioning the lack of due process and the economic risks of politicizing the Fed. The article captures Cook's defense of Fed independence and the presence of Powell during the hearing.
Sky News underscores the historical significance, noting no president has ever fired a sitting Fed governor. It quotes Justice Brett Kavanaugh expressing concern about weakening the Fed's independence and Cook's commitment to uphold it.
The New York Post focuses on the legal nuances, including Justice Amy Coney Barrett's and Brett Kavanaugh's concerns about potential abuse of removal powers. It details the arguments over whether past misconduct justifies removal and the possibility of remanding parts of the case.
The New York Times situates the case within Trump's broader efforts to expand presidential power, noting the Justice Department's investigation into Powell and the backlash from various stakeholders worried about the Fed's credibility.
Business Insider UK presents Cook's legal argument that the firing is politically motivated, not based on performance or economic data, and highlights Powell's accusation of improper political interference.
Together, these sources provide a comprehensive view of the legal, political, and economic dimensions of the case, illustrating the high stakes for the Fed's independence and the limits of presidential power.
How we got here
The Federal Reserve was established in 1913 as an independent central bank, with governors removable by the president only "for cause," a term not clearly defined by law. In August 2025, Trump attempted to fire Fed Governor Lisa Cook over mortgage fraud allegations, which she denies. This move is unprecedented and challenges the Fed's political independence amid Trump's pressure for interest rate cuts.
Go deeper
- What are the legal grounds for firing a Federal Reserve governor?
- How does this case affect the Federal Reserve's independence?
- What could the Supreme Court ruling mean for US economic policy?
More on these topics
-
Donald John Trump is an American politician, media personality, and businessman who served as the 45th president of the United States from 2017 to 2021.
-
The Federal Reserve System is the central banking system of the United States of America. It was created on December 23, 1913, with the enactment of the Federal Reserve Act, after a series of financial panics led to the desire for central control of the m
-
The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the federal judiciary of the United States of America. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all federal and state court cases that involve a point of federal law, and original jurisdict
-
Jerome Hayden "Jay" Powell is the 16th Chair of the Federal Reserve, serving in that office since February 2018. He was nominated to the Fed Chair position by President Donald Trump, and confirmed by the United States Senate.
-
Ben Shalom Bernanke ( bər-NANG-kee; born December 13, 1953) is an American economist who served as the 14th chairman of the Federal Reserve from 2006 to 2014. After leaving the Federal Reserve, he was appointed a distinguished fellow at the Brookings...
-
Dean John Sauer is an American lawyer who has served as the Solicitor General of Missouri since 2017.