What's happened
The horror sequel opened strongly in North America, earning $63 million across 3,412 theaters despite negative reviews. It became the biggest post-Thanksgiving opening and the second-largest horror debut of all time, driven by dedicated fans and a profitable production budget, signaling resilience in theatrical releases.
What's behind the headline?
The box office triumph of ‘Five Nights at Freddy’s 2’ underscores the persistent strength of theatrical horror films, even amid widespread industry doubts. Despite negative reviews, the film’s $63 million opening demonstrates that dedicated fan bases and franchise loyalty can override critical reception. The decision to open exclusively in theaters, rather than streaming, paid off, emphasizing the value of the theatrical experience for certain audiences.
This success also reveals a broader industry trend: horror and franchise films continue to draw audiences, especially younger viewers, who seek communal experiences. The film’s modest $36 million production cost suggests high profitability, reinforcing the viability of low-budget horror sequels. Meanwhile, the film’s mixed critical reception—marked by a zero-star review from The Associated Press—contrasts sharply with audience enthusiasm, as 70% of ticket buyers would recommend it.
Looking ahead, this performance may influence studios to prioritize theatrical releases for similar projects, especially as industry debates about streaming versus cinema continue. The film’s ability to outperform expectations signals that, despite streaming giants’ dominance, theaters remain a vital platform for certain genres and fan-driven content. The ongoing success of ‘Zootopia 2’ and international hits like ‘Wicked: For Good’ further illustrate the resilience of theatrical films in a shifting landscape, though the long-term impact remains uncertain.
What the papers say
The contrasting opinions from the sources highlight the divide between critics and audiences. AP News and The Independent emphasize the film’s record-breaking box office despite negative reviews, with AP News noting the film's $63 million opening and industry implications. Meanwhile, The Post and Yahoo criticize the film’s quality, with Yahoo calling it a 'mess of a film' that panders to fans, and The Post highlighting its disappointing critical reception. This divergence underscores how dedicated fan bases can drive commercial success, even when critics dismiss the film as incoherent or poorly made. The industry’s focus on franchise loyalty and the importance of theatrical releases for certain genres are central themes emerging from these perspectives.
How we got here
The original ‘Five Nights at Freddy’s’ film, released in 2023, was a surprise hit despite streaming availability. The sequel, directed by Emma Tammi and based on the popular video game, expands the franchise with a larger cast and introduces a more unsettling creature, though critics panned it as incoherent. The film’s success highlights the enduring appeal of horror and video game adaptations in theaters, especially among teen audiences.
Go deeper
More on these topics
-
Scott Braden Cawthon is an American former video game developer and writer. He is the creator of the Five Nights at Freddy's media franchise, which began with the development of the eponymous survival horror game in 2014.
-
Universal Pictures is an American film studio owned by Comcast through the NBCUniversal Film and Entertainment division of its wholly owned subsidiary NBCUniversal.
Founded in 1912 by Carl Laemmle, Mark Dintenfass, Charles O. Baumann, Adam Kessel, Pat Pow