What's happened
The U.S. has let the New START treaty expire, prompting fears of an arms race. The Trump administration is considering expanding nuclear arsenals and resuming testing, while also exploring waste management and new nuclear technologies amid global tensions.
What's behind the headline?
The end of the New START treaty marks a significant shift in U.S.-Russia nuclear diplomacy, signaling a move toward unrestrained arms development. The Trump administration's focus on expanding nuclear capabilities, including potential new warships and increased missile warheads, risks reigniting Cold War-era tensions. This approach ignores China's expanding arsenal, which remains a fraction of U.S. size, and undermines longstanding international security frameworks.
Furthermore, the U.S. faces environmental and safety challenges with nuclear waste management. The Los Alamos lab, central to nuclear modernization, is producing waste faster than it can be safely stored, raising environmental concerns. The Department of Energy's push for a new waste repository faces local opposition and logistical hurdles, echoing past failures like Yucca Mountain.
The push for new nuclear reactors, including small modular reactors, exacerbates waste issues, as these designs are expected to generate similar or more waste than existing reactors. Reprocessing technologies, which could reduce waste volume, remain controversial due to proliferation risks and past failures.
Overall, the U.S. is entering a period of heightened nuclear risk, with diminished international safeguards and unresolved waste challenges. This trajectory will likely lead to increased global instability, with allies questioning U.S. reliability and potential proliferation in other nations. The next decade will determine whether diplomacy or escalation prevails in nuclear policy.
What the papers say
The New York Times reports that the Biden administration's successor policies are now overshadowed by the Trump administration's recent actions, including considering expanding nuclear arsenals and resuming testing, which could lead to an arms race. The article highlights concerns about the abandonment of the New START treaty and the potential for increased nuclear proliferation.
Reuters emphasizes the logistical and environmental challenges of nuclear waste management, noting that the U.S. is seeking local communities to host permanent repositories amid rising waste volumes and delays. It also discusses the push for new reactors and the controversy surrounding reprocessing technologies.
The New Mexico Environment Department criticizes the Los Alamos lab for delays in waste cleanup, which heightens environmental risks. Both sources underscore the broader implications of nuclear modernization efforts amid declining international arms control agreements, illustrating a complex landscape of strategic, environmental, and diplomatic risks.
How we got here
The New START treaty, which limited U.S. and Russian nuclear arsenals, expired in February 2026. The U.S. is now pursuing a more aggressive nuclear policy, including expanding its arsenal and resuming underground testing. Meanwhile, efforts to manage nuclear waste face delays and opposition, complicating nuclear modernization plans amid rising global tensions and the end of arms control agreements.
Go deeper
More on these topics