What's happened
Drax power plant continues to burn 250-year-old Canadian trees despite claims of sustainability. A new report links recent wood sourcing to old-growth forests, raising questions about its environmental impact. The UK government extended subsidies, supporting Drax amid ongoing controversy over its environmental practices.
What's behind the headline?
The controversy surrounding Drax highlights the complex intersection of energy policy, environmental sustainability, and corporate accountability. Despite claims of sourcing from well-managed forests, satellite data and official British Columbia government records indicate that Drax’s Canadian subsidiary continued to source old-growth trees recently. This raises questions about the transparency and accuracy of Drax’s sustainability claims.
The UK government’s decision to extend subsidies, even as environmental concerns mount, underscores a broader policy dilemma: balancing energy security with ecological preservation. Drax’s reliance on imported biomass, justified by its proponents as a climate-friendly alternative to fossil fuels, is increasingly challenged by evidence of deforestation and high emissions.
This situation exemplifies the risks of greenwashing in the renewable energy sector. The financial support Drax receives—over £2 million daily—may be based on overstated environmental benefits. The ongoing investigation by the Financial Conduct Authority suggests that regulatory oversight is still catching up with corporate practices.
Looking ahead, the continued scrutiny and potential regulatory penalties could force Drax to overhaul its sourcing policies. Meanwhile, policymakers face the challenge of ensuring that subsidies genuinely promote sustainability, not just energy production. For consumers and environmental advocates, this story underscores the importance of transparency and accountability in green energy initiatives.
In conclusion, Drax’s case will likely influence future policies on biomass sourcing and subsidy allocation, emphasizing the need for stricter verification of sustainability claims and a reassessment of biomass’s role in achieving net-zero targets.
What the papers say
The Guardian’s reports by Jillian Ambrose reveal that Drax’s recent wood sourcing from old-growth forests contradicts its sustainability claims, supported by satellite data and government records. The Guardian also highlights the ongoing regulatory investigations into Drax’s transparency.
Politico provides context on the UK government’s continued subsidies to Drax, emphasizing the political importance of biomass in energy security and the claims that it helps meet net-zero goals. However, critics argue that these subsidies perpetuate environmental harm.
The contrasting perspectives reflect a tension between economic and environmental priorities. While Politico underscores the strategic importance of biomass for energy independence, The Guardian emphasizes the ecological risks and regulatory concerns, illustrating the complex debate over biomass’s role in sustainable energy.
How we got here
Drax, Britain’s largest power station, has long relied on biomass from North American forests, claiming its sourcing is sustainable. Past investigations and regulatory scrutiny questioned these claims, especially regarding deforestation of primary forests in Canada. The recent report by Stand.earth suggests that Drax still sourced old-growth trees in 2024 and 2025, contradicting its claims of avoiding such sources.
Go deeper
More on these topics