What's happened
Recent UK trade agreements with the US and South Korea face questions over their stability and legal footing. The US-UK pharmaceutical deal lacks a formal legal text, raising concerns about commitments and future reliability. Meanwhile, the UK’s trade deal with South Korea secures vital exports and expands market access, but questions remain about long-term impacts.
What's behind the headline?
The UK’s trade negotiations reveal a pattern of volatility and reliance on verbal commitments rather than firm legal frameworks. The US-UK pharmaceutical deal exemplifies this, with critics warning that the absence of a formal legal text makes the agreement vulnerable to renegotiation or collapse, especially given President Trump’s unpredictable stance. The UK government’s emphasis on securing 'concrete outcomes' contrasts with the reality of fragile agreements built on top-line press releases.
Meanwhile, the UK’s deal with South Korea demonstrates a strategic effort to protect vital exports and expand digital and service trade. Lowering the car parts threshold from 55% to 25% for zero tariffs is a significant move, enabling manufacturers to source from China without losing tariff benefits. This signals a pragmatic approach to supply chain flexibility, but also raises questions about the long-term impact on UK manufacturing standards.
Overall, these agreements highlight the UK’s balancing act: seeking to secure immediate economic benefits while managing the risks of unstable, non-legally binding deals. The broader implication is a shift towards more volatile, less predictable trade relationships, which could impact UK’s economic stability and credibility in future negotiations. The government’s focus on short-term gains may undermine long-term strategic interests, especially if agreements collapse or are reneged upon.
The next phase will likely see increased scrutiny of these deals’ legal foundations and their actual impact on UK industries. The government must prioritize formalizing agreements to avoid future disputes and ensure sustained economic growth. The reliance on verbal promises and the absence of comprehensive legal texts could damage the UK’s reputation as a reliable trading partner, especially with major allies like the US and South Korea.
What the papers say
The Guardian reports that the UK-US pharmaceutical deal is lacking a formal legal text, raising concerns about its stability and the US administration’s commitment, especially given President Trump’s unpredictable nature. Critics like David Henig warn that the UK may have made commitments based on verbal promises, risking future renegotiation or collapse.
Reuters highlights the UK’s successful negotiations with South Korea, emphasizing the deal’s focus on digital trade, services, and tariff protections. Trade Minister Chris Bryant and South Korean counterpart Yeo Han-koo describe the agreement as a step towards strengthening economic ties amid global uncertainty. The deal secures £2 billion in exports and reduces the car parts threshold for zero tariffs, benefiting major UK industries.
The Independent echoes these sentiments, framing the South Korea deal as a 'huge win' for British business, with notable praise from companies like Jaguar Land Rover and Diageo. It underscores the deal’s role in safeguarding exports and expanding market opportunities, while also noting the political praise from Keir Starmer and UK officials.
Contrasting these perspectives, The Guardian’s critique of the US-UK pharmaceutical deal underscores the risks of relying on non-binding agreements, which could undermine the UK’s credibility. Meanwhile, the positive coverage of the South Korea deal highlights the tangible benefits for UK industries and the government’s strategic focus on trade diversification.
How we got here
The UK has been actively pursuing trade agreements post-Brexit to replace EU arrangements and strengthen global ties. The US-UK deal was announced amid broader negotiations, but lacks a formal legal text, raising doubts about its durability. The UK’s deal with South Korea was a continuation of previous arrangements, aimed at safeguarding exports and boosting services, especially after the expiry of the EU-Korea agreement. These efforts reflect the UK’s strategy to diversify trade partners and reduce reliance on EU trade, amid ongoing geopolitical and economic shifts.
Go deeper
Common question
-
What does the new UK-South Korea trade deal mean for businesses?
The UK and South Korea have recently signed a new trade agreement that aims to boost economic ties and open new opportunities for UK companies. This deal replaces the previous post-Brexit arrangement and focuses on expanding services, digital trade, and tariff-free access on most goods. But what does this mean for businesses in the UK? Below, we explore the key details and answer common questions about this significant trade development.
More on these topics
-
Sir Christopher John Bryant (born 11 January 1962) is a British politician and former Anglican priest who has served as Member of Parliament (MP) for Rhondda and Ogmore, and previously Rhondda, since 2001. A member of the Labour Party, he was the Minister
-
The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, commonly known as the United Kingdom or Britain, is a sovereign country located off the northwestern coast of the European mainland.
-
South Korea, officially the Republic of Korea, is a country in East Asia, constituting the southern part of the Korean Peninsula and sharing a land border with North Korea.
-
Sir Keir Rodney Starmer KCB QC MP is a British politician and former lawyer who has served as Leader of the Labour Party and Leader of the Opposition since 2020. He has been Member of Parliament for Holborn and St Pancras since 2015.
-
Diageo plc is a British multinational beverage alcohol company, with its headquarters in London, United Kingdom. They operate in more than 180 countries and produce in more than 140 sites around the world.
-
Jaguar Land Rover Automotive PLC is the holding company of Jaguar Land Rover Limited, a British multinational automotive company with its headquarters in Whitley, Coventry, United Kingdom, and a subsidiary of Indian automotive company Tata Motors.
-
Yeo Han-koo is the Minister for Trade of South Korea serving under President Moon Jae-in from August 2021. Yeo is considered a veteran trade negotiator and technocrat.