What's happened
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has announced plans to reverse diversity, equity, and inclusion policies in the US military, emphasizing a return to traditional standards and questioning recent reforms for women and minorities. His comments signal a shift towards a more gender-neutral and physically rigorous military culture.
What's behind the headline?
Hegseth's rhetoric reveals a strategic attempt to reframe military strength around traditional masculinity and physical prowess, dismissing diversity initiatives as distractions. His emphasis on returning to 'original standards' for combat roles ignores the significant progress made since the 1990s, when women and minorities gained access to combat positions and leadership roles. The shutdown of DACOWITS, an influential advisory body, signals a broader rollback of policies aimed at improving retention and opportunities for women, which many argue have strengthened the force. This approach risks undermining the military's adaptability and inclusivity, potentially reducing its ability to attract and retain diverse talent. The narrative also serves political purposes, aligning with a broader conservative critique of social reforms, and may influence future policy directions. The move could lead to increased polarization within the military and impact its global reputation as a progressive, capable force. The focus on physical standards, while important, should not eclipse the value of diversity and inclusion in modern military effectiveness. Overall, Hegseth's stance is likely to provoke significant debate about the future of military culture and policy, with potential long-term consequences for recruitment, retention, and operational readiness.
What the papers say
The Independent reports that Hegseth's comments and actions are part of a broader effort to roll back diversity, equity, and inclusion policies, including the removal of historical training videos and the shutdown of DACOWITS, which aimed to improve women's retention and opportunities. The article highlights that these policies have historically contributed to the military's strength and diversity, citing examples like the Tuskegee Airmen and Women Airforce Service Pilots. Conversely, Bloomberg's James Stavridis offers a more cautious perspective, criticizing Hegseth's dismissive tone towards the military's current capabilities and emphasizing that the US military remains highly lethal and effective. Stavridis warns that Hegseth's narrative risks underestimating the importance of diversity and modern standards, which have historically enhanced military performance. The contrasting viewpoints underscore a fundamental debate: whether traditional standards alone suffice or if diversity and inclusion are integral to a modern, adaptable military force.
How we got here
Hegseth's stance builds on a broader push to reshape military policies, including the 2015 decision to open all combat roles to women and subsequent standards adjustments. His recent actions, including the shutdown of the advisory committee DACOWITS, reflect a move to prioritize traditional physical standards and reduce focus on diversity initiatives. Historically, the US military has been a leader in desegregation and gender integration, but recent political shifts have challenged these reforms, with Hegseth positioning himself against what he describes as a 'woke' culture.
Go deeper
More on these topics
-
Peter Brian Hegseth (born June 6, 1980) is an American government official and former television personality who has served since 2025 as the 29th United States secretary of defense.
Hegseth studied politics at Princeton University, where he was the publi
-
Donald John Trump is an American politician, media personality, and businessman who served as the 45th president of the United States from 2017 to 2021.