United States district judge, District of Massachusetts
Federal judges have blocked elements of President Trump’s efforts to curb birthright citizenship and to centralise voter-roll control, and plaintiffs have asked courts to bar his new orders. Judges in Boston and Washington have issued injunctions preventing the Postal Service and other agencies from implementing parts of his election and citizenship directives ahead of the November midterms.
The executive order directing a federal citizenship list and USPS-ballot delivery has sparked multiple lawsuits. Courts are weighing the order’s legality against states’ rights to run elections and concerns about voter disenfranchisement and administrative burden.
A federal judge has declined to halt President Trump's order to create a federal voter list, allowing continued consideration of the administration's plan to insert the federal government into election administration and to limit mail voting. Rulings stress that the order is not yet implemented, leaving potential harms hypothetical.
Federal judges in multiple courts have halted President Trump’s efforts to tighten mail‑in voting. A D.C. judge has sided with the NAACP to block a USPS rule that would return ballots unless states hand over voter lists; a Massachusetts judge has barred key parts of an executive order that would force federal citizen lists and limit post‑Election Day ballot delivery.
The Supreme Court has upheld Mississippi’s policy allowing mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted if received within five days, a decision that maintains state flexibility and could affect upcoming midterms. Justice Barrett writes for the majority, while Justice Alito dissents.
The Texas App Store Accountability Act remains active after the Supreme Court declines to intervene, letting the 5th Circuit panel's ruling stand while litigation continues. The act requires age-verification measures for app stores and parental consent for downloads by minors. Courts have split over whether the law violates the First Amendment, with ongoing challenges in lower courts.
A new lawsuit filed in Rhode Island targets FEMA and DHS policies, arguing that the administration is forcing states to modify elections systems and assist with immigration enforcement in exchange for federal funding. The suit claims DHS could revoke grants at any time and asserts that such conditions violate the Administrative Procedure Act and the Spending Clause.
The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has refused to lift an injunction blocking several provisions of Trump’s March executive order on voting procedures, keeping a lower-court ruling in effect as the case moves to appeal. The decision comes as states race to adjust ahead of upcoming elections.