-
Why is the Sudan ceasefire failing?
Despite international efforts and declarations of ceasefires, fighting in Sudan persists. Both sides, including the Sudanese army and the RSF, remain skeptical of peace proposals and continue military operations. Clashes such as attacks in Kordofan and the capture of El-Fasher show that trust is lacking, and security concerns outweigh the desire for peace.
-
What are the main obstacles to peace in Sudan?
The conflict is driven by deep-rooted political tensions, regional interests, and internal power struggles. External influences from countries like the UAE and the US complicate negotiations. Additionally, mutual distrust between the Sudanese military and RSF, along with accusations of bias and interference, make reaching a lasting agreement very difficult.
-
How are international mediators trying to help?
International mediators, including the US, regional powers, and the Quad, have proposed ceasefire plans and peace negotiations. However, their efforts are often met with skepticism and rejection from the conflicting parties. Some mediators face criticism for perceived bias, and ongoing clashes show that diplomatic solutions are still a work in progress.
-
What is the humanitarian impact of the ongoing conflict?
The conflict has caused widespread suffering, including displacement, famine, and civilian casualties. Mass killings and attacks on towns like Babanusa worsen the humanitarian crisis. Civilians are caught in the crossfire, with many lacking access to basic needs like food, water, and medical care, making the situation dire.
-
Are there any signs of hope for peace in Sudan?
While recent ceasefire announcements have raised hopes, ongoing clashes and mutual distrust suggest that peace remains fragile. Continued international pressure and renewed diplomatic efforts are needed to build trust and find a sustainable solution. The situation remains uncertain, but global attention keeps the possibility of peace alive.