In January 2026, the US made a significant change to its childhood vaccination schedule, reducing the number of recommended vaccines from 18 to 11. This move has sparked widespread debate and concern among parents, health professionals, and public health experts. Many wonder what prompted this shift, whether it's safe, and how it compares to international standards. Below, we explore the reasons behind this change and what it means for children's health and public safety.
-
Why did the US CDC reduce childhood vaccines in 2026?
The CDC's decision was driven by a directive from President Trump to align US vaccine recommendations with European schedules, particularly Denmark's. The move was led by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a known vaccine skeptic, who restructured the vaccine advisory panel and reduced the recommended vaccines from 17 to 11. The change bypassed usual expert review and was politically motivated, aiming to reshape US vaccine policy.
-
Are fewer vaccines safe for children?
Public health experts warn that reducing the number of recommended vaccines could increase children's vulnerability to preventable diseases. Vaccines are carefully tested for safety and effectiveness, and experts argue that fewer vaccines may leave gaps in immunity, potentially leading to outbreaks of illnesses like meningitis, hepatitis, and influenza.
-
How does this change compare to European vaccine schedules?
The US's new schedule now mirrors some European countries, such as Denmark, which recommend fewer vaccines for children. However, experts caution that healthcare systems, disease prevalence, and population health differ, so what works in Europe may not be directly applicable to the US. The move has raised concerns about whether the US is sacrificing safety for political reasons.
-
What are the public health implications of fewer vaccines?
Reducing vaccine recommendations could lead to lower vaccination rates and increased risk of disease outbreaks. Public health officials warn that this change might undermine herd immunity, putting vulnerable populations, including infants and immunocompromised children, at greater risk of serious illnesses.
-
Is this change backed by scientific evidence?
Critics argue that the decision bypassed the usual scientific review process, raising questions about the evidence supporting fewer vaccines. Many medical organizations have filed legal challenges, emphasizing that the new schedule lacks transparency and scientific rigor, and could harm public health.
-
How are medical groups responding to the vaccine schedule change?
Major medical organizations, including the American Medical Association, have criticized the move, warning it could lead to increased disease transmission. Some states, like Vermont, are trying to maintain their own vaccine schedules to protect public health, highlighting the controversy and division within the medical community.