What's happened
The U.S. Supreme Court is weighing whether President Trump's emergency tariffs are lawful. Multiple companies, including Costco, have filed lawsuits seeking refunds for tariffs paid under these orders. The court's decision could determine if tariffs imposed via the International Emergency Economic Powers Act are valid and whether refunds will be granted.
What's behind the headline?
The Supreme Court's skepticism during oral arguments indicates a likely ruling against the Trump administration's broad use of IEEPA to impose tariffs. This decision could limit the president's unilateral authority to declare national emergencies for trade measures, reinforcing congressional oversight. Companies like Costco have moved preemptively to secure refunds, highlighting the financial risks of these tariffs. If the tariffs are struck down, it will set a precedent that curtails executive power in trade policy, potentially reshaping future presidential authority. The case underscores the tension between national security claims and congressional authority, with broader implications for executive overreach and trade law.
What the papers say
The New York Times reports that the Supreme Court's skepticism suggests a ruling against the tariffs, which could lead to significant refunds for companies like Costco. Al Jazeera highlights Costco's legal efforts to block tariff collection and seek refunds before the December 15 deadline. AP News notes that lower courts have already deemed the tariffs illegal, and the case now hinges on the Supreme Court's final decision. The Independent emphasizes the legal doubts about Trump's authority under IEEPA, with conservative justices expressing concern over executive overreach. Business Insider UK discusses alternative legal avenues Trump might pursue if the tariffs are invalidated, such as Section 301 and Section 232 of trade laws, which have historically been used to impose tariffs and are more firmly rooted in law.
How we got here
President Trump used the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose broad tariffs on imports, claiming national security concerns. Several lower courts have already ruled these tariffs illegal, and the case is now before the Supreme Court. The legal challenge questions whether the president has the authority to impose such tariffs without explicit congressional approval, especially under the emergency powers law.
Go deeper
More on these topics
-
Donald John Trump is an American politician, media personality, and businessman who served as the 45th president of the United States from 2017 to 2021.
-
The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the federal judiciary of the United States of America. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all federal and state court cases that involve a point of federal law, and original jurisdict
-
Revlon, Inc. is an American-based multinational cosmetics, skin care, fragrance, and personal care company headquartered in New York City, Revlon was established in New York City on 1 March 1932, and is listed on the New York Stock Exchange.
-
Costco Wholesale Corporation, doing business as Costco, is an American multinational corporation which operates a chain of membership-only warehouse clubs.
-
Bumble Bee Foods, LLC, is a company that produces canned tuna, salmon, other seafoods, and chicken under the brand names "Bumble Bee," "Wild Selections," "Beach Cliff," "Brunswick," and "Snow's."