What's happened
On July 8, the US 8th Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the Federal Trade Commission's 'click-to-cancel' rule, which would have required subscription services to allow cancellations as easily as sign-ups. The court ruled the FTC failed to conduct a required preliminary regulatory analysis. The rule's suspension leaves consumers facing complex cancellation processes amid ongoing legal and legislative efforts.
What's behind the headline?
Regulatory Process and Consumer Impact
The court's decision highlights the critical importance of procedural rigor in regulatory rulemaking. The FTC's failure to conduct a preliminary regulatory analysis, mandated for rules with economic impacts exceeding $100 million, undermined the rule's legal standing despite its consumer-friendly intent.
Subscription Traps and Market Dynamics
Subscription services benefit from 'negative option' marketing, where silence equals consent to ongoing charges. The blocked rule aimed to dismantle these traps by mandating easy cancellation and clear consent before charging. Without it, consumers will continue to face multi-step, opaque cancellation processes, wasting time and money.
Broader Economic Consequences
Stanford economist Neale Mahoney warns that difficult cancellations reduce market competition, leading to higher prices and lower quality. This ruling thus not only affects individual consumers but also weakens competitive pressures in subscription markets.
Legal and Political Context
The FTC's rule was approved under Chair Lina Khan but faced opposition from Republican commissioners and industry groups. The court panel, appointed by Republican presidents, underscored procedural shortcomings rather than the rule's substance. The current FTC leadership appears unlikely to appeal, shifting the battleground to state laws and congressional proposals like the Unsubscribe Act.
Global and Local Relevance
Though a US ruling, the decision influences global streaming markets, including the UAE, where subscription usage is rising. Without federal mandates, platforms may complicate cancellations, impacting consumers worldwide.
Outlook
Consumers should remain vigilant about subscription terms and cancellation policies. Legislative efforts at state and federal levels continue, but until new rules pass, subscription traps will persist. The ruling underscores the tension between consumer convenience and corporate control in digital markets.
What the papers say
Lekshmy Pavithran of Gulf News highlights the rule's intent to simplify cancellations on platforms like Netflix and Amazon Prime Video, noting the indefinite suspension due to procedural errors and the ongoing FTC trial against Amazon for complex cancellation practices. Ayelet Sheffey at Business Insider UK emphasizes the court's procedural objections, quoting Stanford's Neale Mahoney on the broader economic harm caused by subscription traps and the potential for legislative remedies like California's click-to-cancel law and the Unsubscribe Act. The Guardian provides vivid consumer anecdotes illustrating the frustration and complexity of canceling subscriptions, from Hulu to Roblox, underscoring the real-world impact of the blocked rule. Jon Brodkin at Ars Technica offers a detailed legal analysis of the court's unanimous ruling, explaining the FTC's failure to conduct a required preliminary regulatory analysis and the implications for future rulemaking. AP News confirms the procedural basis for vacating the rule and the FTC's refusal to comment. Together, these sources paint a comprehensive picture of a well-intentioned consumer protection rule halted by legal technicalities, leaving consumers vulnerable and the regulatory landscape uncertain.
How we got here
The FTC proposed the 'click-to-cancel' rule in 2023 to simplify subscription cancellations and increase transparency around free trials and auto-renewals. The rule was set to take effect on July 14, 2025, as part of the Biden administration's consumer protection agenda. However, the 8th Circuit found procedural errors in the FTC's rulemaking process, leading to the rule's indefinite suspension.
Go deeper
- What are the main reasons the court blocked the FTC's rule?
- How will this ruling affect consumers trying to cancel subscriptions?
- Are there any state or federal efforts to replace the blocked rule?
Common question
-
Why was the FTC subscription rule blocked?
The recent court decision to block the FTC's new subscription rule has raised many questions. People want to know why the rule was halted, what procedural errors were involved, and how this might impact consumer rights moving forward. Below, we explore the key details behind this legal development and what it means for consumers and regulators alike.
-
What’s the Latest on EU Sanctions and Global Tensions in 2025?
With ongoing geopolitical tensions, economic sanctions are a hot topic this year. From EU disputes over Russia sanctions to US trade threats, people want to understand how these issues impact global markets and diplomacy. Below are the key questions and answers to keep you informed about the latest developments in 2025.
-
What Does the Court's Decision Mean for Subscription Cancellations?
The recent ruling by the US 8th Circuit Court of Appeals has significant implications for consumers trying to cancel their subscriptions. While the FTC aimed to make cancellations easier with its 'click-to-cancel' rule, the court's decision has paused this effort. Many wonder what this means for their ability to easily end subscriptions and how it might affect future regulations. Below, we explore the key questions surrounding this legal development and what consumers should know.
-
What’s Next for US Consumer Rights and Subscription Laws?
The recent court ruling blocking the FTC's 'click-to-cancel' rule has left many consumers wondering what’s next for subscription protections. With legal and legislative efforts still ongoing, it’s important to understand how this decision impacts your ability to cancel subscriptions easily and what future changes might be on the horizon. Below, we answer some of the most common questions about the future of consumer rights and subscription laws in the US.
More on these topics
-
The Federal Trade Commission is an independent agency of the United States government whose principal mission is the enforcement of civil U.S. antitrust law and the promotion of consumer protection.
-
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit is a United States federal court with appellate jurisdiction over the following United States district courts:
Eastern District of Arkansas
Western District of Arkansas
Northern District of Iowa
So
-
The United States of America, commonly known as the United States or America, is a country mostly located in central North America, between Canada and Mexico.
-
Lina M. Khan is an American legal scholar specializing in antitrust and competition law in the United States. She is an associate professor of law at Columbia Law School.