ICC prosecutor suspended

What's happened

The International Criminal Court has suspended chief prosecutor Karim Khan after its 21-member Bureau found that disciplinary proceedings should go to the full Assembly of States Parties following a UN probe into sexual misconduct allegations. The Assembly will hold a secret-ballot vote of 125 member states to decide whether to remove him; 63 votes will be required for removal.

What's behind the headline?

What this decision means

• The Bureau of the Assembly of States Parties has referred Karim Khan to full disciplinary proceedings and has suspended him pending the Assembly vote. The suspension will not itself determine his fate.

Institutional consequences

• The Assembly of States Parties, made up of 125 member states, will hold a special session and will vote by secret ballot. Sixty-three votes will be required to remove Khan, making removal possible but not certain.

Legal and operational effects

• Khan has already been on voluntary leave since May 2025 and has been removed from some high-profile pleadings. The suspension is therefore likely to have limited immediate operational effect on the court’s work, but it will carry reputational and political consequences.

Political dynamics

• The Bureau said it based its decision on a UN investigation and an ad hoc judicial panel. Sources report the Bureau found that Khan had committed serious misconduct. Khan’s lawyers have issued a forceful denial, saying the decision is "unlawful, procedurally unfair and unsupported by evidence." This conflict will drive the next phase: a politically charged vote across 125 states.

Likely outcome and impact

• The Assembly vote will be political rather than purely legal. States that view the ICC as politicised because of recent warrants will find themselves under pressure to take a position. Removal will require coalition-building across regions; failure to reach 63 votes will allow Khan to contest the decision and seek reinstatement.

What to watch next

• The Assembly will convene a special session as soon as possible; members will receive confidential documentation. Expect lobbying by states, statements from Khan’s legal team, and further disclosures that could shape votes.

Bottom line

• This decision has escalated an 18-month inquiry into a formal political process that will decide whether the court’s top prosecutor keeps his job. It will test member states’ willingness to prioritise institutional integrity over political alignments.

How we got here

Allegations against Khan were first reported more than two years ago. He has been on voluntary leave since May 2025. The Bureau based its decision on a UN watchdog report, advice from a panel of judicial experts and written submissions; it has kept the findings confidential.

Our analysis

The Reuters brief cited by The Times of Israel reports that the Bureau "has ruled Khan... had committed serious misconduct" and that its recommendation will go to all 125 member states for a secret-ballot vote requiring 63 votes for removal (The Times of Israel, Reuters). Al Jazeera’s staff coverage emphasised that the Bureau said the suspension "is not an indication of the final outcome" and that the decision rested on a UN investigation, an ad hoc panel and written submissions (Al Jazeera). The Guardian provided details from a document it saw indicating the 21-member committee voted by qualified majority to find "serious misconduct" and traced the allegations back to claims by a woman who worked at the Hague (Harry Davies, The Guardian). The New York Times described the Bureau as a 21-member oversight body and noted the decision and documentation will remain confidential while the Assembly decides (Jeanna Smialek, The New York Times). Reuters, the Associated Press and AFP coverage, quoted by several outlets including AP News and The New Arab, reported that Khan has denied wrongdoing and that he has been on leave since May 2025; AP and The Independent summarised that the final decision now rests with the Assembly of States Parties. Direct quotes: Khan’s lawyers said the decision is "unlawful, procedurally unfair and unsupported by evidence" (reported by Reuters and Al Jazeera). The Bureau said the suspension "is not an indication of the final outcome" (Al Jazeera; The New Arab).

Go deeper

• When will the Assembly of States Parties hold the special session and vote?
• What evidence did the UN watchdog and judicial panel find and will it be published?

More on these topics

• International Criminal Court - Intergovernmental organization

  The International Criminal Court is an intergovernmental organization and international tribunal that sits in The Hague, Netherlands.

• Israel - Country in the Middle East

  Israel, formally known as the State of Israel, is a country in Western Asia, located on the southeastern shore of the Mediterranean Sea and the northern shore of the Red Sea.

• The Hague - City in the Netherlands

  The Hague is a city on the western coast of the Netherlands on the North Sea and the capital of the province of South Holland. It is also the seat of government of the Netherlands and hosts the International Court of Justice, one of the most important cou

• United Nations - Intergovernmental organization

  The United Nations is an intergovernmental organization that aims to maintain international peace and security, develop friendly relations among nations, achieve international cooperation, and be a centre for harmonizing the actions of nations.

• Benjamin Netanyahu - Prime Minister of Israel

  Benjamin Netanyahu is an Israeli politician serving as Prime Minister of Israel since 2009, and previously from 1996 to 1999. Netanyahu is also the Chairman of the Likud – National Liberal Movement.