What's happened
The UK has enforced new restrictions on advertising unhealthy food and drinks to children, including a ban on TV ads before 9pm and online at any time. The move aims to reduce childhood obesity, with estimates of preventing 20,000 cases and saving around £2 billion annually. The regulations target products high in fat, salt, and sugar, affecting categories like soft drinks, chocolates, and fast food. Despite industry lobbying and shifting tactics, experts see this as a significant step forward in public health.
What's behind the headline?
The new UK advertising restrictions mark a pivotal, though incomplete, step in public health policy. While banning ads for HFSS products before 9pm and online at any time reduces direct marketing to children, loopholes remain—particularly the brand advertising exemption, which allows companies to promote their brands without showing specific products. This loophole enables food companies to pivot their marketing strategies, shifting from product-specific ads to brand awareness campaigns, thus maintaining influence over children’s food preferences.
Furthermore, the rise in outdoor advertising, which increased by 28% between 2021 and 2024, undermines the policy’s effectiveness, especially in deprived areas where children are more heavily targeted. Experts warn that without broader restrictions—such as banning outdoor ads near schools and public spaces—the policy risks being circumvented.
The government’s estimates of preventing 20,000 cases of childhood obesity and saving £2 billion annually are optimistic but depend on enforcement and industry compliance. Critics argue that the policy should go further by ending brand advertising exemptions and regulating outdoor marketing more stringently. The focus on reformulating products to meet nutrient criteria is positive, but without comprehensive restrictions, industry tactics will continue to adapt, diluting the policy’s impact.
In sum, this policy is a necessary but insufficient measure. It will likely reduce children’s exposure to direct advertising of unhealthy foods, but without broader, more aggressive regulation, the fight against childhood obesity will remain incomplete.
What the papers say
The Independent highlights the UK government’s long-delayed implementation of advertising restrictions, emphasizing that the regulations target 13 categories of HFSS products and aim to prevent around 20,000 cases of childhood obesity. Experts like Anna Taylor from the Food Foundation criticize the loopholes, especially the brand advertising exemption, which allows companies to continue marketing their brands without showing specific products.
The Guardian echoes these concerns, noting that the regulations come after years of delays and industry lobbying, which have watered down the original proposals. The article underscores that outdoor advertising has increased significantly, with McDonald’s leading the rise, and warns that outdoor ads in deprived areas could undermine the policy.
Meanwhile, The Japan Times reports that Japan’s similar measures are expected to remove up to 7.2 billion calories annually, reducing childhood obesity by 20,000 cases and delivering ¥2 billion in health benefits. This international perspective highlights that while the UK’s policies are a step forward, other nations are also adopting comprehensive strategies to combat childhood obesity.
Overall, the coverage from these sources illustrates a consensus that the UK’s restrictions are a positive move but require further tightening to be truly effective. Industry tactics and outdoor advertising remain significant challenges, and advocates call for ongoing policy evolution.
How we got here
The UK’s move follows years of debate and delayed policy action aimed at tackling childhood obesity. The restrictions target 13 categories of food and drink deemed most influential in childhood obesity, assessed through a nutrient scoring system. The policy builds on previous voluntary bans and aims to limit children’s exposure to unhealthy food marketing, which research links to cravings and obesity risk. Industry lobbying and concerns about advertising shifts have shaped the final regulations, but health advocates argue more comprehensive measures are needed.
Go deeper
More on these topics
-
Advertising Standards Authority may refer to:
Advertising Standards Bureau (Australia)
Advertising Standards Authority (Ireland)
Advertising Standards Authority (New Zealand)
Advertising Standards Authority (South Africa)
Advertising Standards Authority.
-
Childhood obesity is a condition where excess body fat negatively affects a child's health or well-being. As methods to determine body fat directly are difficult, the diagnosis of obesity is often based on BMI. Due to the rising prevalence of obesity...
-
Ruth Ashley Charman Dalton is a British Labour Party politician and former community worker who has served as Member of Parliament (MP) for West Lancashire since the 2023 West Lancashire by-election, succeeding Rosie Cooper.