What's happened
The European Court of Human Rights is examining whether Britain properly considered Shamima Begum's trafficking victim status before stripping her of citizenship in 2019. Begum, who traveled to ISIS territory as a teenager, challenges the decision, raising concerns over her treatment and the UK's responsibilities under international law.
What's behind the headline?
The European Court's intervention signals a significant shift in how the UK handles cases involving minors trafficked into conflict zones. The court's questions about whether Britain fulfilled its obligations under Article 4 of the European Convention on Human Rights—prohibiting slavery and forced labor—highlight potential legal oversights. The case exposes the tension between national security concerns and human rights obligations. The UK government’s stance remains firm: Begum posed a threat and should not return, but the court's inquiry could force a reassessment of the country's approach to victims of trafficking. This case underscores the importance of considering trafficking and grooming issues in security decisions, especially for minors, and may influence future policies on citizenship revocation and victim protection. The outcome could reshape legal standards and diplomatic relations, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach that respects human rights while safeguarding national security.
What the papers say
The Mirror reports that lawyers argue Begum was 'lured, encouraged and deceived for sexual exploitation' at age 15, and the European Court of Human Rights has demanded answers from Britain regarding her case. Sky News highlights the court's questions about whether Britain had a positive obligation to consider her trafficking victim status before revoking her citizenship, emphasizing the failures to protect her as a child. The Independent notes that Begum's case raises broader questions about the UK's responsibilities towards trafficking victims and the legal implications of citizenship revocation, with the European Court scrutinizing whether her trafficking history was adequately considered before her citizenship was revoked in 2019.
How we got here
Shamima Begum, a London-born woman, traveled to ISIS-controlled Syria in 2015 at age 15. She married an ISIS fighter and had three children, all of whom died. The UK government revoked her citizenship in 2019, citing national security. Her legal battles have included rulings in UK courts and now scrutiny by the European Court of Human Rights, which questions whether her trafficking victim status was properly considered.
Go deeper
Common question
-
What is the latest on Shamima Begum’s citizenship and legal battle?
Shamima Begum's case continues to make headlines as her citizenship revocation is scrutinized by international courts. The UK government stripped her of her citizenship in 2019, citing national security concerns, but her legal team argues that her trafficking victim status was not properly considered. This case raises important questions about the UK's responsibilities towards trafficking victims and the legal processes involved in citizenship revocation. Below, we explore the latest developments and what they mean for Begum and UK law.
More on these topics
-
Shamima Begum is a British-born woman who left the UK aged 15, to join the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant in Syria. Her intention to return to the UK in 2019 resulted in a public debate about the handling of returning jihadists.
-
The European Court of Human Rights, frequently referred to as the Strasbourg Court, is a supranational or international court established by the European Convention on Human Rights.
-
Sajid Javid is a British politician who has served as the Member of Parliament for Bromsgrove since 2010. A member of the Conservative Party, he was Home Secretary from 2018 to 2019 and Chancellor of the Exchequer from 2019 to 2020.