What's happened
As of February 2026, a landmark trial in Los Angeles County Superior Court is underway against Meta and Google's YouTube, accused of deliberately designing platforms to addict children and harm their mental health. The case centers on a 19-year-old plaintiff, KGM, and could set precedent for hundreds of similar lawsuits. TikTok and Snap settled earlier. Meta denies wrongdoing, citing complex mental health factors and safeguards.
What's behind the headline?
Trial Significance and Legal Strategy
This trial marks a pivotal moment in holding social media giants accountable for the mental health impacts of their platforms on children. Unlike previous cases, this one challenges the companies' product design choices rather than specific user content, potentially circumventing Section 230 protections. The focus on deliberate addiction engineering, likened to Big Tobacco tactics, raises the stakes for the tech industry.
Scientific Debate on Addiction
The case exposes the ongoing scientific debate over whether social media use constitutes clinical addiction or problematic use. Meta executives, including Instagram head Adam Mosseri, distinguish between "problematic use" and clinical addiction, while plaintiffs emphasize internal documents describing platforms as "like a drug" and "pushers." This tension highlights the complexity of defining harm in legal terms.
Impact on Platform Design and Regulation
If plaintiffs succeed, the ruling will force fundamental changes in how platforms engage young users, potentially mandating safer design and stricter oversight. The trial also signals growing regulatory and legal pressure globally, with multiple state attorneys general pursuing similar cases. The involvement of high-profile executives like Mark Zuckerberg underscores the trial's importance.
Broader Social Implications
The trial brings to light the broader societal costs of social media, including exposure to harmful content, body image issues, and exploitation risks. It challenges the narrative that mental health struggles among teens are solely due to external factors, emphasizing corporate responsibility. The outcome will influence public discourse, corporate practices, and possibly legislation on digital wellbeing.
What the papers say
The Independent's Morgan Lee details the courtroom exchanges, highlighting Meta's nuanced stance on addiction and safety measures, including the removal of cosmetic filters linked to body dysmorphia. AP News and NY Post provide comprehensive coverage of the trial's opening, emphasizing the plaintiff KGM's story and the companies' internal documents revealing awareness of addiction risks. The Guardian's Hannah Harris Green offers critical insight into the scientific debate over social media addiction, noting experts' reluctance to label it as clinical addiction but acknowledging harmful effects. Sky News frames the trial as a landmark moment akin to Big Tobacco litigation, focusing on the legal strategy to prove negligence in product design. These varied perspectives collectively illustrate the trial's complexity, the clash between legal, scientific, and corporate narratives, and the potential for significant industry impact.
How we got here
The lawsuits stem from allegations that social media companies intentionally engineered addictive features targeting children to boost engagement and profits, similar to tactics used by tobacco firms. Plaintiffs claim these designs caused mental health harms including depression and suicidal thoughts. TikTok and Snap settled, leaving Meta and YouTube as defendants in this first bellwether trial, expected to last six to eight weeks.
Go deeper
- What evidence is being presented against Meta and YouTube?
- How do Meta and YouTube defend themselves against these claims?
- What impact could this trial have on social media platform design?
Common question
-
Are Social Media Platforms Being Held Accountable for Harmful Features?
Legal actions against major social media companies like Meta, Google, TikTok, and Snap are making headlines as courts investigate whether these platforms intentionally design addictive features that harm users, especially children. These cases raise important questions about platform responsibility, mental health impacts, and future regulations. Curious about what’s happening and what it could mean for social media? Read on to find out.
-
What Is the Meta and YouTube Child Addiction Trial About?
The recent trial against Meta and YouTube has brought urgent questions about how social media platforms may be intentionally designing features that encourage addictive behaviors in children. As this landmark case unfolds, many wonder what it means for the future of online safety, regulation, and the mental health of young users. Below, we explore the key details of the case, the arguments from both sides, and what potential changes could come next.
More on these topics
-
Facebook, Inc. is an American social media conglomerate corporation based in Menlo Park, California. It was founded by Mark Zuckerberg, along with his fellow roommates and students at Harvard College, who were Eduardo Saverin, Andrew McCollum, Dustin Mosk
-
Mark Elliot Zuckerberg is an American media magnate, internet entrepreneur, and philanthropist. He is known for co-founding Facebook, Inc. and serves as its chairman, chief executive officer, and controlling shareholder.
-
TikTok/Douyin is a Chinese video-sharing social networking service owned by ByteDance, a Beijing-based Internet technology company founded in 2012 by Zhang Yiming.
-
YouTube is an American online video-sharing platform headquartered in San Bruno, California. Three former PayPal employees—Chad Hurley, Steve Chen, and Jawed Karim—created the service in February 2005.
-
Snapchat is an American multimedia messaging app developed by Snap Inc., originally Snapchat Inc. One of the principal features of Snapchat is that pictures and messages are usually only available for a short time before they become inaccessible to their
-
Google LLC is an American multinational technology company that specializes in Internet-related services and products, which include online advertising technologies, a search engine, cloud computing, software, and hardware.
-
Raúl Torrez (born July 24, 1976) is an American lawyer and politician from New Mexico. A member of the Democratic Party, Torrez is the Attorney General of New Mexico.
-
Instagram is an American photo and video sharing social networking service owned by Facebook, created by Kevin Systrom and Mike Krieger and originally launched on iOS in October 2010.
-
Facebook is an American online social media and social networking service based in Menlo Park, California and a flagship service of the namesake company Facebook, Inc.
-
Adam Mosseri (Hebrew: אדם מוסרי; born January 23, 1983) is an American businessman and the head of Instagram. He formerly was an executive at Facebook, which owns Instagram.