What's happened
World leaders at the UN summit announced new climate goals, including China's pledge to cut emissions by 7-10% by 2035. Despite some progress, experts say commitments remain insufficient to prevent catastrophic warming, with many major emitters falling short of scientifically needed reductions. The upcoming COP30 in Brazil will test global resolve.
What's behind the headline?
The recent climate summit reveals a stark gap between political commitments and scientific needs. China's pledge to reduce emissions by 7-10% by 2035 is a cautious step that falls significantly short of the 30% cut experts deem necessary. This underwhelming target reflects Beijing's traditional preference for steady, predictable progress, but it risks delaying the urgent action required. Meanwhile, the US's continued retreat from climate commitments under Trump has effectively ceded leadership to China, which is now poised to dominate green technology markets. The EU's internal tensions and Australia’s modest targets further weaken the global effort. Despite rising investments in renewables—over $2 trillion in 2025—the overall pace remains insufficient. The UN Secretary-General's warning that the world is on track for 2.6°C warming, well above the 1.5°C goal, underscores the urgency. The upcoming COP30 will be critical in translating these pledges into meaningful action, but unless major emitters dramatically increase their commitments, catastrophic climate impacts are inevitable. The summit's focus on weak targets highlights a broader failure of political will, risking a future where climate change becomes irreversible and unmanageable.
What the papers say
The Japan Times reports that China's pledge to cut emissions by 7-10% by 2035 is a cautious move that falls short of the 30% reduction experts say is necessary. The Guardian criticizes China's targets as too weak to prevent global catastrophe, emphasizing that the commitments are less ambitious than those of other nations like Germany and Japan. Bloomberg highlights that China's new pledge marks a turning point, but still underwhelms compared to scientific recommendations. The Guardian also notes that the US, under Trump, has continued to dismiss climate science, further hampering global efforts. Meanwhile, the Independent underscores the gap between current commitments and what science demands, warning that the world is heading toward 3°C of warming if current trends persist. Overall, the sources agree that while some progress is evident, the global response remains insufficient to meet the Paris Agreement's goals, risking severe future impacts.
How we got here
The international community has been working towards the Paris Agreement's goal of limiting global warming to 1.5°C. Over recent years, emissions have continued to rise, prompting calls for more ambitious targets. China, the world's largest emitter, has historically pledged to peak emissions by 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality by 2060, but its recent commitments are seen as cautious. The US has retreated from climate commitments under Trump, while other nations like the EU and Australia have set targets that are still below what climate science recommends. The UN summit aimed to galvanize stronger action ahead of COP30, amid warnings that current pledges are inadequate to prevent dangerous climate impacts.
Go deeper
Common question
-
Why Are Global Climate Commitments Falling Short?
Despite urgent calls for action, many of the world's biggest emitters are not meeting their climate goals. Countries like China, the US, and the EU have submitted plans that fall short of what’s needed to limit global warming to 1.5°C. With COP30 in Brazil approaching, questions are mounting about why progress is slow and what can be done to accelerate change. Below, we explore the main obstacles, what to expect at the upcoming summit, and how major nations are contributing to or hindering climate efforts.
-
Are Current Climate Commitments Enough to Prevent Dangerous Warming?
Global climate commitments are at a critical crossroads. Despite rising awareness and record investments in renewable energy, many countries' plans fall short of what’s needed to keep global warming below 1.5°C. With major emitters like the US, China, and the EU submitting weak or delayed targets, questions arise about whether current efforts are enough. As upcoming summits like COP30 in Brazil could shape the future of climate policy, understanding the gaps and opportunities is more important than ever. Below, we explore key questions about the state of global climate action and what it means for our future.
More on these topics
-
The United Nations is an intergovernmental organization that aims to maintain international peace and security, develop friendly relations among nations, achieve international cooperation, and be a centre for harmonizing the actions of nations.
-
Donald John Trump is an American politician, media personality, and businessman who served as the 45th president of the United States from 2017 to 2021.
-
Xi Jinping is a Chinese politician serving as the general secretary of the Communist Party of China, president of the People's Republic of China, and chairman of the Central Military Commission.
-
China, officially the People's Republic of China, is a country in East Asia. It is the world's most populous country, with a population of around 1.4 billion in 2019.
-
Simon Emmanuel Kervin Stiell is a Grenadian politician, serving as the executive secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change since August 2022.
-
António Manuel de Oliveira Guterres GCC GCL is a Portuguese politician and diplomat who is serving as the ninth Secretary-General of the United Nations. Previously, he was the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees between 2005 and 2015.